Search

Showing posts with label Monhegan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Monhegan. Show all posts

Oct 13, 2020

Maine's off-Monhegan prototype ocean wind project drops from two floaters to one.

Listen to the August 18, 2020 zoom presentation & QA concerning the latest iteration of Maine's floating offshore wind turbine project.

33 minute presentation and q&a (mp3) AND Lincoln County News story 8/25/20.

EXCERPTS FROM ARTICLE BY LCN's Evan Houk
"New England Aqua Ventus LLC,
a joint venture between Diamond Offshore Wind, a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Corp., and German RWE Renewables, the second-largest company in offshore wind globally, has replaced the previous company behind the project, Maine Aqua Ventus 1 GP LLC, according to Jake Ward, vice president for innovation and economic development at the University of Maine." 

"Wissemann was joined in the Zoom call by two colleagues at Diamond Offshore Wind, David Deutsch and Duncan McEachern, as well as a consultant recently hired by the company, Genevieve McDonald."  

 "$100 million in funding for the project, dubbed New England Aqua Ventus I."

"New England Aqua Ventus LLC will lead construction, deployment, and operations for the single 10- to 12-megawatt wind turbine..."

"The university’s Advanced Structures and Composites Center will handle design, engineering, and research and development for the project, and will monitor it once it is operating."

 "Chris Wissemann, CEO of Diamond Offshore Wind, spoke for the joint venture and said he hopes to identify a landing site where the underwater cable from the wind turbine can tie into the power grid by the end of 2020:.

 "The route of the cable and where it will make land, both points of contention in mainland communities since the initiation of the project several years ago, are not yet clear." 

"Wissemann said a central concern is researching the impact that the turbine will have on the ecosystem of the area, particularly on fishermen." 

"We think it would be prudent to build only on research that demonstrates how people can operate around these things — how right whales can operate around these things, how fisherman can fish,” Wissemann said."

"New England Aqua Ventus LLC hopes to begin submitting permit applications early next year and start building the foundation in 2022, said Wissemann."

END OF EXCERPTS

Jan 16, 2018

Maine Aquaventus FOAA of DMR 2017 names and organisations listed

Maine Aqua Ventus FOAA of Maine Coastal Program DMR Maine Department of Marine Resources. List of officials and others involved.

Here is a list of the state and federal officials, academia , consultants and wind industry listed in the  DMR March-Nov 17, 2017 FOAA documents released to Friends of Penobscot Bay.  

MAINE AGENCIES
Shannon Ayotte  office of DMR commissioner  Shannon.Ayotte@maine.gov
Kate Tierney (MAG Representative)
Nixon, Matthew E
Burrowes, Todd  Coastal Program  Federal consistency, dredging, takings, public trust
Leyden, Kathleen ME Coastal Program
Desjardin, Tom;  
Noll, John Submerged Lands Director
Marvinney, Robert G.  UMaine 
John Noll (MDACF) 
Carl Wilson (MDMR)
Sue and Dawn Hallowell (MDEP)
Stacie Beyer (LUPC) 
Bob Stratton (MDIFW) 
Dennis Nault (MDMR)
Jeff Thaler  (UME atty)
Jake Ward (UME)   

FEDERAL
Wende Mahaney (USFWS) 
Sue Tuxbury NOAA (cable routing)
Jay Clement (USACE)
Mark McCollough (USFWS) 
Michelle DesAutels (USCG) 


 Andy Qua (Kleinschmidt) Andy.Qua@kleinschmidtgroup.com or Jeff Thaler Jeffrey.Thaler@maine.edu  (UMaine) 

UNIVERSITY OF MAINE
Jeff Thaler jeffrey_thaler@maine.edu;
Jake Ward jsward@maine.edu;
Damian Brady damian.brady@maine.edu;
Tony Viselli anthony.viselli@maine.edu;

CONSULTANTS
Peter Browne <Peter.Browne@hdrinc.com>;
Andy Qua Andy.Qua@KleinschmidtGroup.com
Kayla Easler <Kayla.Easler@KleinschmidtGroup.com>

Ocean Renewable  Power  Company
N Johnson njohnson@orpc.com

Dec 7, 2017

Maine AquaVentus Project: Federal and state officials and others involved

The plan to build and operate a pair of floating wind turbines off Monhegan Island requires  coordination between local state and federal officials, academia , the interested public, wind industry    Read below of 13 federal officials, 27 state officials, 4 UMaine academics, 3 consultants and 1 representative  of ORPC the underwater turbine power company.
FEDS
Dept of Energy 
Diana Heydar diana.heyder@ee.doe.gov;
Lori Gray lori.gray@ee.doe.gov;
USFWS 
Wende Mahaney wende_mahaney@fws.gov;
Mark McCollough mark_mccollough@fws.gov;
Army Corps
Jay.L.Clement  Jay.L.Clement@usace.army.mil;
LeeAnn Neal LeeAnn.Neal@usace.army.mil

US Coast Guard
Michele E. DesAutels  Michele.E.DesAutels@uscg.mil;
David Bourbeau David.T.Bourbeau@uscg.mil;
NOAA
Mike R. Johnson mike.r.johnson@noaa.gov;
Susan.Tuxbury Susan.Tuxbury@noaa.gov;
David.Bean David.Bean@noaa.gov;
Jordan.Carduner  jordan.carduner@noaa.gov;
Jeff Murphy@noaa.gov

STATE
Wilson, Carl <Carl.Wilson@maine.gov>;
Marc Denis Nault Marc.Nault@maine.gov;
Tierney, Katherine <Katherine.Tierney@maine.gov>;
Kemper, Keel <Keel.Kemper@maine.gov>;
Chamberlain, Kristen <Kristen.Chamberlain@maine.gov>;
Benoit, Nathaniel <Nathaniel.Benoit@maine.gov>;
Stratton, Robert D <Robert.D.Stratton@maine.gov>;
Beyer, Jim R <Jim.R.Beyer@maine.gov>;
Callahan, Beth <Beth.Callahan@maine.gov>;
DiBello, Carol <Carol.DiBello@maine.gov>;
Noll, John <John.Noll@maine.gov>;
Beyer, Stacie R <Stacie.R.Beyer@maine.gov>;
Hallowell, Dawn <Dawn.Hallowell@maine.gov>;
Keliher, Patrick  patrick.keliher@maine.gov;
Cotnoir, Sarah <Sarah.Cotnoir@maine.gov>;
Todd, Charlie <Charlie.Todd@maine.gov>;
Nixon, Matthew E <Matthew.E.Nixon@maine.gov>;
Sullivan, Kelsey M <Kelsey.M.Sullivan@maine.gov>;
Bergeron, Mark <Mark.Bergeron@maine.gov>;
Cloutier, Rene <Rene.Cloutier@maine.gov>;
Taylor, Joyce <Joyce.Taylor@maine.gov>;
Perry, John <John.Perry@maine.gov>;
Spiess, Arthur <Arthur.Spiess@maine.gov>;
Mohney, Kirk <Kirk.Mohney@maine.gov>;
Hopkin, Megan M <Megan.M.Hopkin@maine.gov>;
Marden, Kendall R. <Kendall.R.Marden@maine.gov>;
Bensinger, Peggy <Peggy.Bensinger@maine.gov>

UNIVERSITY OF MAINE
Jeff Thaler jeffrey_thaler@maine.edu;
Jake Ward jsward@maine.edu;
Damian Brady damian.brady@maine.edu;
Tony Viselli anthony.viselli@maine.edu;

CONSULTANTS
Peter Browne <Peter.Browne@hdrinc.com>;
Andy Qua Andy.Qua@KleinschmidtGroup.com
Kayla Easler <Kayla.Easler@KleinschmidtGroup.com>

POWER COMPANY
N Johnson njohnson@orpc.com

May 2, 2017

Me Legis Committee hears testimony for and against bill challenging Monhegan floating wind farm siting.

On May 2, 2017, the Maine Legislature's Energy Utilities and Technology  Committee heard testimony for and against LD 1262  An Act To Protect Monhegan Island by Limiting Wind Turbines.   Below, listen to mp3s of each speaker

Full hearing 3hr 31min  (hearing was already underway)


Intro by Maine Senator Dana Dow Lincoln County  5min (in progress)


Travis Dow 4min 46sec 

Kathie Ianicelli. 3min 10sec  Monhegan


Angela Monroe Governor's Energy Office & QA 12min


Jessica Stevens 3min30sec

Tara Heyer 4min38sec


Cole Lord  2min30sec


John Murdoch 2min 54sec


Marian Joffee  5min45sec


Angela Ianicelli  3min 40sec

Chris Oneill  3min 15sec


Don Lathrop 3min 35sec


Winnie Murdoch, 3min 25sec

Mary Webber, 2min 35sec

George Hart, Tenants Hbr 2min35sec

Jackie Boegal 4min 15sec

Andrew Fennemann friends of Muscongus Bay. 4min 15sec

Julie Eaton MLU 3min 40sec

Kim Ervin Tucker  6min 50sec

Doug Boynton_Tenants Harbor. 1min32sec

Lucas Chaffee  3min 17sec

Speaker from__plantation. 2min30sec

David Edson of James Sewall Co 3min 18sec

Jay Morancy (?) 5min25sec

Mal Carey 3min 43sec

Jeff Thaler UMaine Counsel 15min

Waldo Wales, 3min 38sec

Paul Hitchcox_birder 3min 31sec

Chris Smith Monhegan power district. 1 min 25sec

Peabody Consultant 2min 5sec

____Weber_55sec

Jim Belanyea_METF 

Group of UME students & profs 12min 43sec

Anthony Viselli UME  3min 50sec

Robin McCoy 3min 30sec

Alison Hill 1min30sec

Joyce Blakeney 2min 45sec

Pamela Rollinger 3min

Barbara Hitchcock 2min 45sec

Haley MacDougal  2min 32sec

Habib Dagher & QA 7min

Dylan Vorhees NRCM  3min 30sec

Derek Lovitch 3min 13sec

Kathy Leeman 3min_45sec

Doug Hitchcox  3min22sec

Dan Reilly 4min 28sec

James Monroe 2min18sec

Jake Ward 5min 45sec

Susanne McDonald to end 3min 4sec




































MANY MORE TO COME REFRESH YOUR BROWSER
















MORE TO COME CHECK BACK

Feb 18, 2017

FOAA ME Coastal Program re Maine Aqua Ventus 12/1/16- 2/9/17. Plus Participants list

Friends of Penobscot Bay used the Maine Freedom Of Access Act  to request Todd Burrowes of the Maine Coastal Program  to provide copies of  "Public records in your files dated from December 1, 2016 to February 9, 2017 that pertain to the Maine AquaVentus project to build and operate floating windturbines in state waters off Monhegan Island."

 Tood Burrowes response  (8page pdf including FOPB FOAA request)

State officials, NGOs  in Burrowes  FOAA'd email
*  Ayotte, Shannon  DACF Commissioner's Office <shannon.ayotte@maine.gov

* Burrowes, Todd  Coastal Program. Federal Consistency <Todd.Burrowes@maine.gov

* Leyden, Kathleen <Kathleen.Leyden@maine.gov> Maine Coastal Program, Chief

* Nixon, Matthew E  Coastal Program - Ocean planning <Matthew.E.Nixon@maine.gov>, 

* Townsend, Erle  DEP Commissioner's office <Erle.Townsend@maine.gov

* Zabierek, Tina   DEP Policy Director  christina.s.zabierek@maine.gov

NGOs
* Heather Leonas ME Ocean & Wind Industry Initiative <heather.leonasmca@gmail.com
* Kay Mann  Maine Green Power Program outreach coord<kmann@3degreesinc.com> .

-------------

Jan 29, 2016

2016 Offshore Maine floating windpower 1/29/16 webinar. Audio & slides

Audio and slides from the 1/29/16 webinar presentation "Maine's Floating Offshore Wind Project: Moving Forward".

Speakers were Habib Dagher, Director, University of Maine's Advanced Structures and Composite Center, and  Jeff Thaler, Asst University Counsel and Maine AquaVentus Legal Counsel,

 The two cover the past, present and future of floating ocean wind turbines in the Gulf of Maine. Speakers refer to this slideshow

Habib Dagher
Introduction 3min37sec       

Habib Dagher  part 1  15 minutes

Habib Dagher part 2  14min55sec

Jeff Thaler 4 minutes

Habib Dagher Part 3 5 minutes

Q &A Part 1  6 minutes
Jeff Thaler

Q&A Part 2 to end of webinar 6 min 
UME's mini prototype in  Castine harbor storm


Jan 12, 2014

Maine's floating windpower project. The backstory & unfilled gaps in knowledge 2005 - 2014

Below find details about the Maine offshore windpower initiative from 2005 to the present:  government documents,  simulations, audio recordings of Maine's legislature, offshore wind industry fishermen and public; scientific/technical reports, birder concerns and more, relating to the proposal to set up floating windmills off Monhegan, Maine.

Agency and NGO Background Documents
Letters, memos, reports that the Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands produced & received in 2009 & 2010 while selecting & approving the Monhegan offshore windpower site. 359 pages

Audio recordings. MP3s.

July 11, 2013 Webinar "Making History with Volturnus" (wmv) 
(Including Jake Ward of DeepCwind)
November 29, 2009 Maine Offshore Energy '09 
June 15-18, 2009 Energy Ocean 2009

SITING, SCENIC IMPACTS & SIMULATIONS  
Dr. Habib Dagher of UMaine has repeatedly stated the importance of siting ocean windmills sufficiently offshore that they are over the horizon from the mainland. Listen to two excerpted quotes and then the full recordings. 
* Two excerpts from audio statements by UME's Habib Dagher (May 20, 2010 & August  11, 2011)  
* August 11, 2011   Listen to Dr Dagher answer a question about siting the windmills 20 or more miles offshore. Island Institute presentation at Strand Theater, Rockland.
* May 20, 2010  Listen to Dr. Dagher's 45 minute talk at the Rockport Opera House calling for them to be 20 to 50 miles offshore.   45 minutes.   

SIMULATIONS
Simulation of Volturnus floating windturbines' likely impact on Maine lobster larvae (1 min long)  Aqua Ventus floating windturbines location off off Monhegan will create a large windshadow and ocean current-slowing zone, where  induced upwelling and downwelling waters in the energy footprint of the turbines may divert downeast lobster larvae-bearing coastal current away from the midcoast.  See Jumars 2010 report, below, for details

SCIENCE. 
University of Maine's "research cluster" of faculty scientists reviewing or taking part in the offshore wind process.

April 20, 2012  New ocean windfarm fishery impact study: drop in local species; increases in exotics.   The effect of floating wind on the plankton and other sealife that relies on  surface water currents.


* 2010 Report. Dr. Peter Jumars, Director of the UMaine School of Marine Sciences.  Read Page 13 of his report "Anticipated Environmental Effects of Offshore Windpower Development in the Gulf of Maine". Dr. Jumars cites Norwegian govt scientist Göran Broström's report "On the influence of large wind farms on the upper ocean circulation." (Norwegian Meteorological Institute, 2008) .Göran Broström wrote that the ocean windfarms  reduce wind energy striking the waters  surrounding the turbine  "sufficiently enough that the local ecosystem will most likely be strongly influenced by the presence of a wind farm". Dr Jumars wrote: "This effect could be important offshore because deep waters of the Gulf of Maine stratify in summer. Would it be bad or good?" 

* May 1, 2012 Study of the nature of the "Gigawatt wakes" that windturbines create behind them. Viewed from an efficiency point of view but useful to ecological point of view also.


May 25, 2012

DeepCwind won't deploy floating test turbine this year

 Bad news for devotees of Habib Dagher's plan to install floating deepwater windpower extractors in the Gulf of Maine.  But good news for wild & scenic Gulf of Maine.

The Spring 2012 deployment of the DeepCwind Consortium's  prototype floating wind turbine off Monhegan has been delayed until  2013. This according to a May 24, 2012 story  in the weekly Free Press of Midcoast Maine : "Deep Water Wind Test Turbine Postponed Until 2013"

Writer Christine Parris noted  that the DeepCwind Consortium is having problems gaining several  government permits and has been forced to push back launch of its prototype windmill until next spring.  
She wrote: 
"Dagher said that some permits were still pending for the Monhegan site, but that he expected them to be approved in the next two to three months, which will push the launch date to next summer. "

"still pending?"  It seemed  like the permits were settled more than a year ago.  I wonder which ones they're having trouble with?  Or is that a mask for investment woes?

Or could this be proxy war between Statoil with their Maine Hywind project  and the University of Maine led DeepCwind Consortium? Statoil with their Maine Hywind project, and DeepCwind Consortium with their Monhegan Test site?  If so, Statoil's deep pockets & its deepwater experience will pose a major challenge for Maine's home team DeepCwind to overcome, if they are to compete.


Dr Dagher has declined to respond to an inquiry on exactly which permits remained to be acquired.

The mind boggles


Oct 2, 2011

DeepCwind: Feds declare "no significant impacts" to Monhegan or GOM. Okay funding

Monhegan's viewshed and soundshed will change for the first time in some time, as the University of Maine and its DeepCwind Consortium finally get their multimillion dollar check cut by the US Dept of Energy to build the various components of America's first offshore wind turbine and tow them out to a site 2 miles south of the island.  

Happily UMaine has chosen to build a prototype for floating deepwater floating windpower extracting structures (see image), rather than the stick-in-the-mud steel & concrete thickets that other states have envisioned off their coasts.   

Key dimensions
* Blade length 13m (42.7ft)
* Rotor Diameter 27 m (88ft)
* Tower height: 13.7 m (44.9)
* Upper hull hgt: 23.4m ( 77ft)

Key Materials 
Blades: fiber reinforced polyester resin
Tower: Steel
Hull: Steel
Mooring Lines: HMPE Polyethylene
Anchors: Steel boxes filled w/ copper slag


It is the belief of the developers of the DeepCwind prototype, that they will learn sufficiently from this test bed over a two to three year period, to build and safely and cost-effectively deploy a great armada of floating deepwater turbines 25 and more miles off Maine.  Time will tell if they are right.


Below are links to all the documents used in the Department of Energy's decisionmaking process that has finally approved University of Maine’s "Deepwater Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Testing and Demonstration Project, Gulf of Maine" aka DOE/EA 1792 (pdf)

Feb 3, 2011

While Judge Hjelm considers Huber v BPL, a Federal agency's release of a draft EA on financing DeepCWind's start-up project off Monhegan could be a game changer.

All sides in the question of what standards ocean windmills will have to meet off Maine await two big decisions:

1. Knox County Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Hjelm's upcoming decision in Huber v Bureau of Parks & Lands over the sufficiency of the state agency's review of the probable scenic impacts and impacts to migrating seabirds, if the University of Maine's planned  deepwater wind test center two miles off the southern tip of  Monhegan Island goes forward.

2.  This month's release by the US Department of Energy of  a draft environmental assessment of the environmental impact of its proposal to give twenty million dollars to the University of Maine for a pair of  deepwater wind projects. See earlier DOE notice. The plans include::

(A) One or more prototype 1/3 sized  floating windmills (plus  undersea test structures), off Monhegan, &  
(B) A single full scale operational 5 megawatt deepwater floating windmill, to be towed to an as-yet only dimly defined location, either off Monhegan or "20 to 50 miles" offshore, according to the University

The agency's assessment must be carried out according the National Environmental Policy Act and the agency's own strict NEPA guidelines (11pg pdf file; ignore the "SUN" references). According to the guidelines, the two DOE officials involved:  Kurt Rautenstrauch and Laura Margason must:

*"Identify any adverse environmental effects that cannot be avoided should this proposed  action be implemented."
* "Evaluate viable alternatives to the proposed action, including a no action alternative."
* "Describe the relationship between local short-term uses of the environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity."
* "Characterize any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources that would be involved should this proposed action be implemented."


Link to the information and issues supplied by Penobscot Bay Watch to the DOE. 

If Judge Hjelm  takes an approach similar to the one he took in Huber v MDOT, he will wait to see  the Department of Energy's draft  EA: Will the agency agree with Penobscot Bay Watch that more needs to be considered bird-wise, beauty-wise, lobster larvae-wise, currents-impact-wise? If so, then he may rule in in Huber's favor. If not, not.   

Stay tuned. 





Sep 12, 2010

Monhegan: decision nears in lawsuit over scenic & bird impacts of planned U&Maine floating R&D windmills

For Immediate Release 9/9/10
Contact  Penobscot Bay Watch (207) 691-7485

Decision nears in litigation over Maine's proposed offshore wind R&D center

Monhegan. This rocky isle off the coast of Maine, a migratory haven for birds and human beings alike, has hosted generations of both for long centuries.  Amid the hawks, songbirds and seabirds that birdwatchers have painstakingly documented as using Monhegan's thick forests, and feeding, courting and fighting in the winds and waters south of the island's Lobster Cove,  This forever natural, privately owned isle also attracts artists from around the world, who have come to Monhegan to ply their crafts, and have gone away with inspired paintings, sculptures, photographs and poetry. 

Monhegan also fronts the location where four critical coastal currents collide off Penobscot Bay, bringing a bounty of baby lobsters (and their prey and predators)  to the Midcoast and to points south - a delicately balanced ecological/economic dance from sea to sky that has brought prosperity to the region for centuries.


This forever natural, privately owned isle with its tiny village is a refuge for wildlife on an increasingly developed midcoast aine also attracts artists from around the world, who have come to Monhegan for much the same reasons as the wildlife and have gone away with inspired paintings, sculptures, photographs and poetry. 

But this twofold wealth of seafood and scenic beauty may end, if an alliance of industrial contractors, engineering firms and 'Ivory windTower' academics calling themselves the DeepCwind Consortium have their way.

Their plan, approved December 14, 2009  by the Maine Bureau of Parks and lands, but presently under litigation brought by a deep ecologist, would set up the vanguard of  a powerfully energy-extractive offshore ocean wind and wave industry two miles from the island, directly in the place where the currents come together.  Following that first site, the offshore wind industry hopes to put dozens of windmills within this critical zone, though a few miles further out to sea.

Rockland resident and longtime Penobscot Bay activist Ron Huber has taken a stand in Maine Superior Court against this offshore wind rush. Huber filed suit in January asking Superior Court Justice Jeffrey Hjelm to order a halt to the project until the state and University make an effort to find out how their project would affect what is ecologically and oceanographically the "womb" of the Gulf of Maine, as well as an place of unparalleled beauty.  

"Assistant Attorney General Amy Mills has entirely dropped the ball on the critical questions of Monhegan's  ecology and aesthetics. Maine's lobster fishery and Monhegan's art and scenery-powered economy rest upon systems that this DeepCwind project  would blindly toy with." Huber said. "Yet in the rush for federal funds, the state and university have decided to ignore  such potentially inconvenient truths."

Truths they are, for researchers around the world studying the environmental impact of ocean windfarms are in growing agreement that their deployment does affect existing  ocean currents and thus can effect climate.   Especially at the scale that US and European governments are promoting in the North Atlantic. (See links, below)

"The reaction from DeepCwind Consortium head and professor of engineering Habib Dagher has been that he doesn't care," Huber noted.  "Hopefully Justice Hjelm will help him see the light."

Mills'  recent  brief to the court downplays possible impacts on the ecology of birds and lobsters,  and on the ineffable beauty of the location. The state agrees that the towers, generators, pumps, blades and lights proposed to be operated at this renewable lease site will dominate the artistically and aesthetically renowned vistas of this crown jewel of American wild coastal beauty. But somehow, Mills and the attorney for the University claim, the blinking lights, flickering blades, noise and subsonics coming from their facility would have no impact on those unspoiled vistas off Monhegan's Lobster Cove, long an end destination sought by the world's artists. 

Furthermore, Jeff Thaler, a private attorney  representing the University of Maine in the case, has written to Judge Hjelm that he acknowledges that Huber has been involved in protecting Penobscot Bay  from development and pollution for many years, that Huber visits Monhegan and  even  that Huber's deep ecological stewardship impels him to protecting those natural assets from harm.  Nonetheless, Thaler has told the judge, the believes that Huber has no standing to bring his case. Even if he does, Thaler claimed, the fact that there is nothing built and operating out there yet  means the case is premature.  

"That's like waiting to appeal a timber sale until after it has been clearcut," Huber said.  "Mr. Thaler knowns perfectly well that the decision by the Bureau of Parks and Lands  can be appealed as soon as it is made."

"This is now up to the court " Huber said. "One wishes that instead of scurrying for cover, the state of Maine and the University raised their collective eyes from the economics of this subsidized venture, and took a look at the environmental and cultural assets that, like truant children, they are so heedlessly bent on defacing."  

"Do it right. Or don't do it."

# # #

LINKS TO STUDIES ON THE IMPACT OF OCEAN WINDFARMS ON OCEAN CURRENTS AND CLIMATE:





On the influence of large wind farms on the upper ocean circulation
. Goram Brostrom, Norwegian Meteorology Institute. 2008 


Excerpt: "We show through simple analytical models and idealized numerical experiments that a wind speed of 5–10 m/s may generateupwelling/downwelling velocities exceeding 1 m/day if the characteristic width of the wind wake is of the 

same size or larger than the internal radius of deformation. The generated upwelling is sufficiently enough that the local ecosystem will most likely be strongly influenced by the 

presence of a wind farm.




* Windmills at sea will affect the climate  Goram Brostrom, Norwegian Meteorology Institute. 2008 (note this is a google translation from Norwegian.
Excerpt: "A new study from the Norwegian Meteorological Institute has shown that a wind farm that provides an impact on the wind field at the same time will provide a powerful impact on the local ocean currents, and probably on the amount of phytoplankton that can grow in the ocean. Windmill parks will affect the wind field over an area much larger than the parks themselves, and the effects on the ocean will also apply to an area much larger than the size of the park."





Potential climatic impacts & reliability of very large-scale wind farms. 3/12/2010 C. Wang & R. G. Prinn, MIT Ctr for Global Change Science.(Read commentary on this report)




Excerpt: "For very large-scale utilization of this resource, there are however potential environmental impacts...


"We use a three-dimensional climate model to simulate the potential climate effects associated with installation of wind-powered generators over vast areas of land or coastal ocean. Using wind turbines to meet 10% or more of global energy demand in 2100, could cause surface warming exceeding 1 °C over land installations. In contrast, surface cooling exceeding 1 °C is computed over ocean installations, but the validity of simulating the impacts of wind turbines by simply increasing the ocean surface drag needs further study. Significant warming or cooling remote from both the land and ocean installations, and alterations of the global distributions of rainfall and clouds also occur. These results are influenced by the competing effects of increases in roughness and decreases in wind speed on near-surface turbulent heat fluxes, the differing nature of land and ocean surface friction, and the dimensions of the installations parallel and perpendicular to the prevailing winds."








Excerpt: " Using wind turbines to meet 10% or more of global energy demand in 2100, could cause surface warming exceeding 1 °C over land installations. In contrast, surface cooling exceeding 1 °C is computed over ocean installations, but the validity of simulating the impacts of wind turbines by simply increasing the ocean surface drag needs further study. "



*

  Could Windmills Alter the Weather? Meteorology News on University of Maryland Study 2009 
Excerpt: "A team of researchers from the University of Maryland have found that large-scale use of wind turbines as a power source may have an impact on our environment directly opposite that which they purport to minimize:  Climate change."



* 

Research on Windfarm-Climate Interactions. University of Maryland research mentioned above.

Excerpts: "Recent work  on the climate impact of very large scale wind farms has demonstrated appreciable effects on surface temperature, including warming and cooling on the order of a degree Celsius"....."These results show a zonal pattern suggestive of a reduction in meridional heat transport."...."... The patterns of warming and heating seemed most related to changes in wind direction, resulting in advective heating and cooling, and in changes in cloud fraction that influenced solar heating patterns"..."These experiments show a significant remote influence of large scale roughness changes on synoptic scale winds. My graduate student Dan Barrie and I are now exploring the influence of  time-varying surface roughness on downstream storm tracks."


End of excerpts