Search

Showing posts with label Island Institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Island Institute. Show all posts

Feb 4, 2023

Marine Resources Committee hears from Fishing & AQ groups. No enviros allowed to speak

On January 31st 2023 the Legislature's Marine Resources Committee held its second orientation meeting. The earlier one featured officials of the different bureaus of the Dept of Marine resources related state officials.

* Committee Introductions 3min 15sec

* ME Lobster Marketing Collaborative Maryanne LeCroix, Cara Morrison 14min

* Maine Lobstering Union  Virginia Olsen  11min 2sec

* Maine Coast Fishermen's Association Ben Marten 17min

* ME Aquaculture Association Sebastian Belle 27min41sec

* Island Institute  Nick Battista and Sam Belmat  15min

* Manima. ENGO Marissa Macmahan_dir fisheries 17min 

*

ME Seaweed Council Bonnie Tobey, Ben Marten
  31min 45sec
 7mi 14sec

* Me Lobstermens Assoc
iation
Kristan Porter to mtg end 7min 14sec

Feb 3, 2021

Me Legislature's Environment & Natural Resources Committee - Feb 1, 2021 - Orientation Day speakers

 Committee intro

Report 1 Dalyn Houser,  Saco River Corridor Commission

Report 2 Leeann Hanson. Joint Environmental Training Coordinating Committee/

INTRODUCTIONS  (Each from to to 3 minutes long)

1. Acadia Center (Jeff Marks)

2. Agricycle Energy (Dan Bell)

3. American Chemistry Council (Margaret Gorman)

4. Associated General Contractors of Maine (Matt Marks)

5. Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (Jake Cassady)

6. Baxter Law (Holly Lusk)

7. Casella Resource Solutions (Jeff McBurnie)

8. Casella Waste Systems (Toni King)

9. Coalition for Community Solar Access (Kaitlin Kelly O’Neill)

10. Conservation Law Foundation (Sean Mahoney)

11. Consumer Brands Association (Greg Costa)

12. Consumer Healthcare Products Association (Carlos GutiƩrrez) (No Show)

13. Defend Our Health (Sarah Woodbury)

14. Dirigo Partners (Garrett Mason)

15. Don’t Waste ME (Ed Spencer)

16. Drummond Woodsum (Joanna Tourangeau)

17. Eaton Peabody (Bill Ferdinand)

18. Ecomaine (Kevin Roche)

19. Efficiency Maine Trust (Michael Stoddard)

20. Environment Maine (Anya Fetcher).

21. Friends of Casco Bay (Ivy Frignoca)

22. Friends of Penobscot Bay (Ron Huber)

23. Glass Packaging Institute (Scott DeFife)

24. GrowSmart Maine (Nancy Smith)

25. Hart Public Policy (Deb Hart)

26. Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Maine (Carl Chretien) (No-show)

27. Hospitality Maine (Greg Dougal)

28. Industrial Energy Consumer Group (Tony Buxton)

29. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (Sharon Treat)

30. Island Institute (Nick Battista)

31. Maine Association of Planners (Tex Haeuser)

32. Maine Association of Wetland Scientists (Alieta Burman)

33. Maine Audubon (Eliza Donoghue)

34. Maine Beverage Association (Newell Augur)

35. Maine Conservation Voters (Beth Ahern)

36. Maine Dairy Industry Association (Julie-Marie Bickford)

37. Maine Farm Bureau (Julie Ann Smith)

38. Maine Farmland Trust (Ellen Griswold)

39. Maine Forest Products Council (Patrick Strauch)

40. Maine Grocers and Food Producers Association (Christine Cummings)

41 Closing remarks /End of meeting











Mar 19, 2019

Maine bill to " Help Municipalities Prepare for Sea Level Rise". What the interests & public testified

LD 563 An Act To Help Municipalities Prepare for Sea Level Rise  

Public hearing held Feb 27, 2019 Work session was held March 6th
Sponsor Blume of York. Cosponsored By Senator Breen of Cumberland And Representatives: Bailey of Saco, Bryantof Windham, Denk of Kennebunk, Hobbs of Wells, Hymanson of York, Jorgensen of Portland, Mccreight of Harpswell, Rykerson of Kittery
Bill's fiscal note says minimal expense

LD 5678 Public Hearing Testimony,
Battista, NickIsland Institute
Bell, JeremyThe Nature Conservancy
Belle, SebastianMaine Aquaculture Association
Blume, LydiaMaine State Legislature
Corbin, GarrettMaine Municipal Association
Faunce, RobertLincoln County Planning Commission
Feldman, LeeMaine Association of Planners
Marvinney, RobertDepartment of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry
Romano, JeffMaine Coast Heritage Trust
Smith, NancyGrowSmartb Maine

Jul 20, 2017

Rockland Fishpier Dredge plan FOAA docs June 2016 to July 2017.

On July 20th,Rockland Harbormaster Matt Riley responded to Friends of Penobscot Bay's  request for info on dredge plans for Rockland's Municipal Fish Pier  with the below emails and documents. They date from June 26, 2016 to July 19,2017. Thanks Matt!

2016 first then 2017

NOTE: attachment links at ends of pages won't work. Those attachments are posted separately with an  * asterix* in front of name.

2016  Emails relating to Rockland Fishpier dredging and renovation

062616_Richard Whitman fisherman, Matt Ripley


062616_Bud Brown president EcoAnalysts, Inc to Audra Caler-Bell Rockland community development spec; Matt Ripley, Rockland Harbormaster Cc: Tim Forrester & Lisa Vickers (EcoAnalysts)

* 070816 Refined sample map

070916_Bud Brown. Audra Caler-Bell; Matt Ripley Cc: Tim Forrester; Lisa Vickers

071116_ Bud Brown, Audra Caler-Bell; Matt Ripley Cc: Steve Durrell -Prock Marine

080916_Peter Tischbein ACOE Cc: Jay Clement ACOE; Shawn Mahaney ACOE; Audra Caler-Bell; Matt Ripley; Tim Forrester; Lisa Vickers(biologist,EcoAnalysts) 

* 080916 Rockland Fish Pier Grain Size Analysis for Use of Sand as Cover for Dredge Material.

090216_Kim King (MDOT) to Brian Downey (ME Pilotage Assn) re Port Safety Forums 106 & 107

090916_Peter Blanchard DEP  to Matt Ripley.

091916_Peter Tischbein to Ripley


112216  Carol Woodcock (Senator Collins), Matt Ripley, Nick Battista (Island Institute), Patricia Aho, (Collins)


2017 Emails relating to Rockland Fishpier Dredgeing and renovation

























Nov 28, 2015

Apr 30, 2015

Rockland rejects Big Gas April 29, 2015

On April 29, 2015 Rockland City Council listened to the people of the city from all walks of life and rejected a proposal to grant  an option for a Boston energy company  to buy and demolish City Hall and town  public services buildings and  build a large natural gas burning cogeneration plant.

AUDIO MP3s
Full public speaking part of the meeting  44minute mp3

Separate speakers at  the meeting 
Speaker 1 Ron Huber Friends of Penobscot Bay 
Speaker 2 Joe P__? 48sec2
Speaker 3 Jessie Watson 1 min
Speaker 4 David Myslabodski 3min12sec
Speaker 5 Amy Files 2min30sec
Speaker 6 Sandra Schramm 3min 59sec
Speaker_7 Catherine Foghill 2min
Speaker_8 Wilkinson-Green 2min 6sec    
Speaker_9 Brian Fuller 2min 31sec
Speaker_10   Eric Herbert 3min 11 sec.
Councilor Clayton Williams
 casts the deciding No vote

Speaker_11 Charlie Jordan 57sec 
Speaker_12 Susan Paige 2 min 33sec 
Speaker_13  Brooks Winner, Island Institute 3min 13sec
Speaker_14 Terry Woodland 54drc
Speaker_15 Debby Atwell 
Speaker_16 Louis F___ 2min 9sec
Speaker_17 Maggie Trout 67sec
Speaker_18 James York 1 min 55sec  

The Bangor Daily News wrote
"The vote came after more than a dozen residents urged councilors to reject the agreement, citing concerns about environmental safety." Bangor Daily News story 


Island Institute rep supporting 
Big Gas & dismissing "Nimbys" 
at 4/29/15 Rockland City
 Council special meeting.
The Island Institute's representative (right )spoke in favor of "continuing the conversation" with the Boston gas company. He regrettably also tried to make NIMBY actions (NOT IN MY BAY) as an undesirable thing. There was no disclosure of the 'Tute's decade-long relationship with the windpower division of  the gasser wannabee, Energy Management Inc .





Apr 15, 2014

Belfast Bay craters - bigger than you think! And more important.

From the Island Institute, important facts about the floor of upper Penobscot Bay.
Images courtesy NOAA.

Pen Bay pockmarks as big as the Rose Bowl

It turns out that Penobscot Bay hosts the largest known concentration of these pockmarks anywhere in the world   by Heather Deese and Susie Arnold


Image by NOAA vessel RUDE
The seafloor of Penobscot Bay has been in the news quite a bit lately due to controversy around a proposed dredging project in Searsport. A little-discussed aspect of the dredge proposal is that the Army Corp of Engineers is proposing to deposit the dredge spoils into an expansive cavern on the sea floor in western Penobscot Bay, called a "pockmark."

The existence of these giant pockmarks is not widely known outside the scientific and fishing communities—but has been the subject of study for three decades by our leading marine geologists in Maine. It turns out that Penobscot Bay hosts the largest known concentration of these pockmarks anywhere in the world, each one formed by the release of naturally-occurring methane gas.
The University of Maine's Dan Belknap and Joe Kelley started studying these features in 1984. On their first cruise, they partnered with a local lobsterman because fishermen have known about these depressions for decades. At the time they weren't on the charts, but fishermen observed that lobsters congregate in the depressions, and traps set in them came up carrying sticky blue clay.

The blue clay was the first clue indicating glacial sediments and methane.
"We have had incredible cooperation from fishermen over the years," Belknap said. "They have provided us with very good clues about what is actually going on. It would have taken us a lot longer to figure this out on our own."

Three decades later, after ship-based surveys with side-scan and multi-beam sonar, ROV (remotely-operated vehicle) surveys, and even manned submersible visits, Belknap and his colleagues now know a lot more about these formations. But they still have unanswered questions.

In a sonar image the pockmarks appear as a field of cone-shaped depressions crowded together in groups or strung out in chains "as if connected like a string of pearls," explained Belknap.

There are thousands of pockmarks in northwestern Penobscot Bay, but they also occur in smaller clumps or chains in muddy seafloor areas up and down the coast of Maine. A medium sized pockmark is about 60 feet wide and 20 feet deep. Many are smaller. A few are as large as the Rose Bowl.

Sonar and sediment core data pointed to naturally-formed methane gas as the force creating these pockmarks. The methane seems to have been formed by microbes acting on rich organic material that was deposited when these areas were wetlands at the end of the ice age, over 11,000 years ago. Over time, as the methane bubbles have escaped through the surrounding sediments and up through the water, the seafloor has slumped, forming the cone-shaped features.

While the pocks are ubiquitous in the bay, the total amount of methane is small, and capturing it commercially would not be economically feasible.

But questions about the pockmarks still persist: Do they form in rapid events or through slow outgassing? Are they still being formed? Are they stable?
There are anecdotal reports of fishermen seeing bubbles come to the surface—one lobsterman described it as looking like a submarine was surfacing—but this outgassing has not been observed or recorded during scientific surveys.

The most recent scientific evidence indicates the pockmarks are not likely actively forming, Belknap noted. Nonetheless, uncertainly persists about whether methane is being released and what the contribution could be to local ocean chemistry, including acidification.

What the scientists do know is that the pockmark walls contain what appear to be vents, and that these walls are not stable.

"I was in a submersible one time too close to the edge of a pockmark and we started an underwater landslide," Belknap recalled. "The captain of the submersible said ‘We are not doing that again!’”

While we do not know everything we would like to about these features, they serve as a reminder that the seafloor off our own coast can be a fascinating and ever-changing environment—not the silent deep many of us think of as sitting below the waves.

Dr. Heather Deese is an oceanographer and VP of Strategic Development at Island Institute. Dr. Susie Arnold is a marine ecologist and Marine Scientist at Island Institute.

Aug 14, 2012

Legal Wrangling Continues over Searsport LPG



From: Island Institute's "Working Waterfront" newspaper. August 2012 edition

Legal Wrangling Continues over Searsport LPG
By Douglas Rooks.

Review of a proposed $40 million, 22.7 million gallon liquefied propane gas (LPG) storage tank is now in the hands of the Searsport Planning Board. But opponents and skeptics of the project still wonder if their concerns will ever be fully addressed.

“There’s a tremendous number of moving parts, and the responses we’ve seen to date tend to raise more questions than they answer," said Steve Miller, executive director of the Islesboro Island Trust——whose organization has not yet taken a position on the project.

Attorney Steve Hinchman represents a local citizens group, Thanks But No Tank, which has concluded that potential harm from the project outweighs any benefits, and appealed issuance of two state permits in Kennebec County Superior Court.
Among the legal issues raised by the group are noise levels, visual and scenic impacts, and the lack of a lighting plan from the developers, DCP Midstream Partners of Denver, Colo.

A brief from the State Attorney General’s oflice says the Department of Environmental Protection acted correctly in issuing the permits. And DEP spokeswoman Samantha DePoy-Warren, said, “Our review of this project . . . was a thorough and thoughtful one and was completely in keeping with the high standards of review that are within our jurisdiction under the Natural Resources Protection Act and the Site Location of Development Act."

DEP did impose several conditions on the permit, including a requirement that DCP Midstream pay $305,835 into a state conservation fund as mitigation for disturbing two acres of wetlands and rerouting a stream.

DePoy—Warren also noted that, although there were 30 written comments, no one requested a public hearing, which could have brought the matter before the Board of Environmental Protection and triggered a more extensive review.

Hinchman conceded that point, but said that BEP hearing requests were only possible for 20 days after DCP Midstream’s application was filed, in April 2011, and that “people in town were just starting to become aware of the size and scope of this project."

DEP issued the permits in September, while the Army Corps of Engi- neers signed off in April of this year.

The project still needs a Maine Fuel Board permit, and will need a federal Environmental Protection Agency permit before operating, but at this point, town review could be the last major step before construction. No Tank’s appeal of DEP’s permit decisions is now before Superior Court Iudge Nancy Mills, who could issue a ruling at any time, since the judge has not requested oral arguments.

But Hinchman is still not convinced that state and federal reviews will adequately consider the impacts. There is, for instance, the issue of public safety. “There are only two LPG storage plants on the East Coast of this magnitude,” he said — in Tampa, Fla., and Norfolk, Va. “And both of them are in heavily industrialized areas remote from homes and retail businesses?

Hinchman wonders how a volunteer fire department like Searsport’s would be able to cope with a major spill or fire. He noted that a spill at a nearby fuel depot required dispatch of a foam truck from Portland.

The tank would be built on 23.6 acres at the northeast corner of the port site, relatively close to Route 1. The Angler restaurant would be a near abutter, something that led its owner to join the No Tank group. A mile—long pipeline will connect the harbor site to the storage tank, which will be 138 feet high, almost three times the height of any existing tank in Searsport. A town height restriction was increased from 50 to 150 feet at a lightly attended town meeting in March 2011, by a vote of 79-66.

Nor do some local residents believe the state has appropriately gauged the impact of truck traffic; initially, all LPG would be moved by trailer, although rail line access is available.

One comment that doesn’t sit well with local residents came from Dave Allen, a DOT traffic engineer, who said at a recent public meeting, “Route 1 has tens of thousands of vehicles going down it every day. No one is even going to notice these trucks." The terminal is expected to operate year-round, 24 hours a day.

For Steve Miller, it is coastal navigational issues that are particularly daunting. In its review of the project, the U.S. Coast Guard recommended that no other vessels be in the shipping lane while LPG tankers are approaching the pier at Searsport. “Managing traffic during the busy summer months could take a lot more sophisticated system than anything that’s in place there now,” he said.

Miller is also disappointed and surprised that the Army Corps of Engineers didn’t require an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the project, opting instead for a more abbreviated environmental assessment. “That could still change," he said. “Searsport could still request an ElS."

Miller noted that, in an application for a now-moribund liquefied natural gas plant on Cobscook Bay, the applicant’s EIS said in its alternatives analy- sis that Searsport would be unsuitable for LNG—and, he added, the National Fire Marshal’s office considers LPG to be more hazardous than LNG.

Arch Gillies, an Isleboro selectman, says it’s significant that at least seven neighboring municipalities have written to the Searsport Planning Board raising concerns. “There’s a real sense that this project is a lot bigger than anyone realized when the application was filed last year," he said. “I think that’s starting to sink in.”
But whether that realization will lead to more scrutiny is anyone’s guess. “In the filings, it’s diflicult to see the need for something this large,” Miller said.

“They say there was a propane shortage in Maine in 2007, but that was really more about transportation bottlenecks than supply. It’s hard to argue that all this new infrastructure is really necessary."

Former Maine Times and Kennebec Journal editor Douglas Rocks has been covering Maine issues for 25 years. He lives in West Gardiner.

Sep 12, 2011

Island Institute: Blurring the Facts.

In his essay "The Blur of Summer", Island Institute chief  Phil Conkling muses on the passing of that season, and bashes a bit at critics of ocean wind farms, who'd managed to disrupt the harmony of the  Institute's recent gathering of ocean wind enthusiasts with a small protest outside on Main Street featuring a drum and coffin labeled RIP Maine Lobster.

In "The Blur" Phil steams restlessly up and down the Maine coast, marking locations where his institute - standing on the not inconsiderable shoulders of credit card magnate Charles Cawley - distributed bits of Cawley's fortune to the handful of year round occupied islands, most in the form of large libraries and schools, in the mode of "build it, they will come".

He also marked other philanthropic ventures, then sounded a note of injured pride as he comes to Vinalhaven, where a trio of hastily raised windfarms - quite unlawful from US F&WS' point of view - has raised the ire of many of the island citizenry for again erecting  monumental architecture in a low key natural environment.

From this annoying blemish of seeming ingratitude, Phil finally turns to what has really been eating him all month: Our little display in front of Island Institute headquarters on Main Street during their ocean windpower gathering where two enviros and three fishermen used fliers, posters, a coffin, and a muffled drum to get out the word that improperly sited ocean wind farms could wreak havoc of lobster larvae transport.

We enviros and fishermen ended our event then joined the windmill enthusiasts in the the Strand Theater where after a pair of short films, the institute had organized a panel discussion. We each asked a polite question during the Q & A, as did the few other fishermen at the event. None of them were supportive of ocean windpower without severest of safeguards

In his essay "The Blur of Summer", however, Philip uses artistic license to somehow transpose us to being outside the panel discussion beating a drum, while we were  inside recording it and asking questions.

"But it turned out," Conkling wrote, "there were more lobstermen inside the Strand Theater participating in the panel discussion that followed the films than outside beating the dream."

True because  nobody was beating the drum at that point - we'd all joined the panel discussion so we could quiz the panelists.

What was truly telling though was Conkling's fascinating Freudian slip, where he accuses us, not of beating the drum, but rather of "beating the dream".  For Philip's Dream - a Downeast variant of  Polynesia's Cargo Cult, would mechanize and industrialize Maine's coast into what Phil imagines as the good old days of President  Arthur, when Rosco Conkling's New York political machine helped spawn a new steel navy.

Philip's Navy is more patrician, however, and discharges money instead of  artillery shells.




Jul 15, 2011

Island Institute Offshore Wind Exploitation webinar 7/7/11 AUDIO recordings.

The meeting was organized by Island Institute. Speakers included Heather Deese, Ph.D., II Director of Marine Programs, Amanda LaBelle, II Marine Programs Associate, Suzanne Pude II Community Energy Director, & Birgitta Polson, II Community Energy Fellow. Matt Nixon from Maine State Planning office also spoke..  See Power Point Slides from the Webinar. 
 
AUDIO
* Welcome to meeting. 4 minutes 10 seconds

* Heather Dietz, Intro part 1. 3 minutes Describes Island Institute Concern over threat of energy costs for islands drives them. Research tech Outreach. Stance of offshore wind energy supportive. apprriately siteds and where local benefits aligned with local costs.

* Heather Dietz, Part 2. 2 minutes Describes offshore wind energy Maine motivations is that water is quite deep. Strength of wind and proximity to major load centers. High level interest and support funding from feds. Concern is high dependence on fossil fuel Vulnerable. And have strong wind.

* Heather Dietz, Part 3. 2 minutes Maine has 5 gigawatt goal by 2030 = 3% of national energy development. Also other uses of electricity. Very early stages One full scale one existing StatOil has the Hywind floating wind turbine10 miles off Norway. And U Maine has its plan.

* Heather Dietz Part 4. 2min 4 seconds Current status of state. Governor's ocean energy task Force. LD 1810 ocean wind legislation and 25 mw pilot project green ocean energy

* Heather Dietz reads UMaine official Jake Ward's 2 memos. 5 minutes Maine's 5 GW by 2030 plan. DeepCwind tech update UMaine offshore wind lab.

* Matt Nixon, GIS expert, State Planning Office. 5 minutes

*Question and Answer period 1. 5 minutes. Maine compared to other states? More action south of Cape Cod. Because pole tech is old tech. 800 ocean windmills are seafloor mounted off Europe. Siting within ten miles of Monhegan - become precedent?  

Answer. Two siting locations within state waters: 1. a process that would allow for permit application in state waters, and (2) the experimental prototypes. (3) Commercial sized incentivizing development offshore would be ten miles out. Subsidized longterm rate at which electricity would be purchased is being considered by PUC power [FIGURE 22A]. Outside that the pilot 25 megawatt project would be considered by PUC whether off Monhegan, off Matinicus or off Portland would be up to the specific interest of developers putting in proposals.

* Q&A on undersea cables and corridors. 5 min 
Will they be sent directly to Boston by undersea cable.Or Maine?

* Heather Dietz on outreach to fishers and NGOs

* Amanda LaBelle & Suzanne Pude on coming events. 11 min. August 11th film and discussion, "On the Horizon" at The Strand Theatre in Rockland. September 15: Island Institute hosts "Sites and Sounds of Offshore Wind Energy" In Oct November "Wind Turbines on Land and Sea"

* Alan Round of Gulf of ME Research Institute on Spatial Data. 4 minutes

* Role of Maine SeaGrant. 2 min 40 sec Discussion of Seagrant's role in offshore wind energy development: outreach re DeepCwind in an ongoing series of "grange hall" style informal conversations with coastal communities. [Note poll on how well the webinar went.]

* BOEMRE and offshore sites update. 2min13sec
 
* Local Benefits

* Entire Webinar audio Click here. 77minutes

Jun 22, 2011

Island Institute sells out (again) to big industry

In his latest drizzle of class warfare  "Listening to the Scenery"  Island Institute's ever-industry-toadying Phil Conkling once again obeys his corporate masters and sneers at the "voice of the people"  for demanding a say in whether windfarms shall industrialize their landscapes.

Phil bemoans the fact that "anyone who can spare a half hour to assemble expert opinions from the internet can mount a campaign to stop something". Merely, he complains,  to benefit "some ill defined majority".   In other words to Phil, the problem is simply that the rabble is being allowed "too much public input". 

Phil was once part of the rabble, until Charlie Cawley's thankfully now extinct debt peddling empire MBNA  took Conkling's little Island Institute from its harborside shack and into its corporate embrace for what he describes lovingly as "commercial intercourse".  He's never looked back, content to frisk at the feet of his industrial masters,  always ready to bristle and howl  at the commoners when  instructed to do so. 


But his thunderbolts are McLightning - all flash and no wattage. 

Dec 7, 2010

Offshore Wind Conference: Dec 14th Belfast

On Tuesday December 14th, 2010, the Island Institute will host the "Offshore Wind: Tools and Information for Coastal Stakeholders" conference. 

Topics are the standard fare for these events:
* "Maine's new offshore wind goals
 
* Critical factors that will impact the development of offshore wind
 
 * East Coast experiences with offshore wind siting
 
* Concepts and tools for evaluating ocean renewable energy projects

* Improving the community outreach and permitting process
"

In this context, "improving the permitting process"  means weakening the environmental & conservation rules .  Island Institute, NRCM, CLF and a host of other eco-yuppy outfits have decided the War on Carbon's end justifies the means; laudably global in thinking but hideously impractical for the health of the wild Gulf of Maine.

Nov 5, 2010

Maine windmill pushers make the rounds in Massachusetts

Susan Pude of the Island Institute's Maine Community Wind subsidiary has been making the rounds in the Bay State, promoting coastal and island windmills. Joined by  Dave McGlinchey of the environmental consulting firm Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, and others.
 
Disappointingly, in a recent Boston Globe article, Pude doesn't discuss the results of her efforts promoting windmills on the mainland - a resounding rejection by three towns at once. This may be a record; more importantly, residents of Camden, Hope and Rockport (1) got educated by reviewing the information presented them by the wind industry's supporters,(2) reached out to residents of other towns where windmill plans were being reviewed or had already passed or been rebuffed, (3) attended the meetings of Camden's mildly pro-wind energy committee and the town's governing body, listening respectfully and speaking on both points of fact and concerns over quality of life.

Residents of the three towns then decided they didn't want them, and made that clear to their town leaders. Democracy spake; the Camden Hills remain the scenic and wild asset that much of these towns' tourism and creative economies nestle around.

What is most striking about Pude and the other windpower boosters in the article is that, despite the fact pointed out in the article, that "...95 percent of wind power proposals fail to win local permitting approval..." Manomet and Island Institute - both of whom profit handsomely from their technical support on behalf of the wind industry - arrogantly see these civic decisions as impediments to be overcome. Overruled.

This damn-the-public,-full-speed-ahead position suggests that McGlinchey's & Pude's organizations' claims of serving "the public interest" - the basis of their non profit status- ought to be reevaluated. For the public is speaking loudly, while Manomet and Island Institute are feigning deafness to all but the clink of money.

Oct 27, 2010

Camden drops windmill plan for Ragged Mountain!

Camden Selectboard has dropped plans to appoint a Ragged Mountain Wind Work group, due to the lack of support for the plan and in fact strong public opposition.  Camden's decision sets an important precedent that all Maine towns blessed with scenic assets should heed.
See photographs of lovely  Ragged Mountain Media coverage: The Free Press... Bangor Daily News
Ragged Mountain. Photo by Jan Gilley
 
Listen to a podcast of the  hour long discussion and decision.
 
To summarize the meeting:


First a two minute presentation by Jan Gilley of  Friends of Ragged Mountain, updating on the increase in  that group's membership and on the educational events they've held around town. She also urged the proposed wind work group be balanced, and that people with ties to wind corporations be disallowed from being part of it.

The rest of the recording is the Selectboard examining the candidates for the Work Group,  selecting four people, then, after taking comments from the meeting attendees and discussing the whole mess, deciding to scrap the three town plan entirely, and focus on more benign energy conservation etc.  

Starting around  56:42  the motion is made  to shelve the plan and alert the other two towns that the three town work group is not to going to happen. A tiny bit of discussion follows and then a unanimous vote to cancel the work group. The four newly appointed work group members are discharged of their duties.
Jan Gilley photo

Jun 16, 2010

Ragged Mountain wind wannabes in Maine can't decide how many they want


At the June 15th meeting of the Camden Selectboard, nearly an hour was spent on a  Ragged Mountain windfarm presentation and Q&A by George Baker of the Island Institute's "Maine Community Wind" group, the institute's for-profit subsidiary. Listen to Baker (30 minutes) and to the question and answer session afterward. (24 minutes)

Indeed money is what this meeting was about:  how to set up a shell non-profit to incubate a fully for-profit entity within it; this corporation would then hatch out like a cuckoo's egg and take on 99% absentee control over the community's wind turbines operation. All in the warm bosom of wonderful government subsidies just waiting for canny investors to use Maine towns as "mules" to reap.    All in the Maine tradition of service to country; of towns willing to sacrifice their ecotourism-based economies to do their part fighting climate change, hand in hand (ahem) with the energy investment community. Isn't that wonderful?

The deal for the town or towns: Not only Camden but Lincolnville and Rockport would include (I think) that the absentee corporadoes would be limited to only a small percentage of the profit, with the bulk of the revenue for debt servicing and reduced power rates awarded to the the minority owners: the community itself.
A shell game, but Uncle Sam likes being fooled, one is assured. Now, community being a diaphanous thing, in this day and age, the 'Tute's bagman Baker showed that a select group of industrial operations would be considered a "community".

The variety of financial shenangians the Island Institute's Baker offered up were near unending; one could mix and match Camden with Lincolnville, with Rockport, with this existing utility or that one, as nauseum. But for all the financial scheming, never EVER until pressed did Baker want to talk about the windmills themselves!
How many? one imagines most Camdenites in the room, and watching on cable, wondering. Would it be a line of towers like Mars Hill? A trio like Vinalhaven? But they were to be disappointed.

For despite taking part in months and months of studies and meetings about extracting Ragged Mountain's wind, neither Baker nor co-worker Susan Pude would offer up any visual image of the proposed windfarm, or even of the number of towers.

It was, Baker said smugly, unknowable, thanks to all the possibilities at this stage; in short, he would not speak a number, for fear of the audience at once populating in minds' eyes Ragged Mountain's magnificent ridges topped by waving shrieking spinners blinking through the nights. Mustn't have that. Let's stick to how much money Camdenites will save on their electric bills! Next question, please.

Short memory: he and Des Fitzgerald of the Camden Energy Committee, who stepped into the discussion now and then, had earlier discussed scenarios of 3,4,5, maybe seven 400+ foot wind turbines filling that gap between Ragged Mountain and Bald Mountain.

But wind wannabes have learned that no good can come of discussing the hideous steel towers. Focus on the money! The savings! The civic joy of owning one's own renewable energy supplier! The green patriotism!

Baker wasn't above stretching the truth at times. He spoke breathlessly about the "bunch of regulators" the Institute had gotten together with in the cause of be-winding Camden. Asked who the bunch consisted of, he said it was actually only one Public Utilities Commission official. Asked which official, Baker said the person had retired! He then declined to name he or she.

As for Nature? Surely the fact that winds blow mightily past that mountaintop means that our area's flying wildlife and passing migrators all use that as part of the great windy bird conveyor belt?

Nary a mention! Nature is something to deal with later, in the permitting process, once things are underway. And yet Island Institute bills itself as a Conservation Organization! Phil Conkling has apparently found that the secret to keeping his $150,000 per year salary flowing is knowing which way the wind blows. Dr Podolsky was at the meeting, too, doubtless mulling over how to certify-in-advance that turbines would be bird & bat friendly on Ragged Mountain.

There's something creepy in the hungry fervor of these energy hucksters. Impatient for magnate-dom, and driven to distraction by all these citizen groups and town governments getting between them and their pot of golden wind