Search

Dec 30, 2020

Port Safety Forum's 12/29/20 presentation by Habib Dagher, UMaine offshore wind pioneer.

The December 29, 2020 meeting of the Maine New 
Hampshire Port Safety Forum featured a talk by University of Maine's offshore wind efforts by professor Habib Dagher, followed by a lengthy Question and Answer session.   Listen to both below, as well as selections from the Q&A session

Habib Dagher UMe gives  Maine AquaVentus presentation 41min

Habib Dagher  Q&A Session 50 minutes 10 seconds

Maine DEP /BEP recommends no slowdown of waste imports into Maine, yet embraces "environmental justice".

After going through all the agency prose emitted by Maine DEP in response to the citizen initiated rulemaking to bar disposal in Maine of waste originating outside of the state of Maine, one can safely summarize it  as

The Board of Environmental Protection is unable to visualize a  Maine that does NOT import  waste from other states for burning and/or permanent storage  in  waste mounds.   The agency advising the Board  rests its case  on the wording of  the bad bill that  passed in a late night classic rush job,  badly amending state waste law so that it  recognizes construction and demolition debris or other "trash" wastes from other states as "Maine waste" once lightly processed inside the border.      

While they don't want to slow the flow of waste coming into Maine, the Board, however envisions adopting  the phrase "environmental justice" into rule and statute, so that the waste flow equally pollutes the air, water and soil of  rich and poor Mainers alike.  

As nothing seems to have come out of DEP   The Board should petition the governor to introduce legislation this session to close the waste importation loophole,  While it is too late for a legislator's  bill in 2021  Governor Mills can and should cause DEP to introduce a department bill  that would end bulk waste imports to Maine at any time.

The basic statement and response to comments

a critical section to read.    included all of DEP‘s responses, and some public  comments.

> Response to Comments 1-10 and 13-18

DEP clinging to the definition passed by the corrupted bill
>
> The Department acknowledges the many comments and the extensive information submitted both in support of, and in opposition to, the proposed change to the definition of “waste that is generated within the State” in the rulemaking petition.  Each comment and all information provided was reviewed and carefully considered. The Department, however, agrees with commenters who argued that the petition’s proposed definition of “waste that is generated within the State” is inconsistent with statutory language passed by the 129th Maine Legislature (PL 2019 Chapter 619), and that the Board of Environmental Protection therefore, does not have authority to adopt it in rule.  The Department is proposing that 06-096 C.M.R. Chapter 400 be modified to make its provisions consistent with this legislation.
>
> 11.Comment:  The definition of “bypass” should also be revised because the list of situations in which bypass is allowed in the current rule includes “for any other reason”.

A small win: DEP proposes making law and rules consistent about waste stream "bypassing" 
>
> Response:  Public Law 2019 Chapter 291 (LD 112) modified the statutory definition of “bypass” as recommended by the Department.  In its recommendation to the Board concerning the pending rulemaking petition, the Department is proposing that the regulatory definition of “bypass" be made consistent with statute.  In so doing, the phrase“for any other reason” would be eliminated

Too hard for Maine!?!

> 12. Commenter: Massachusetts and other states have strengthened their rules to protect the environment and prohibit disposal of certain wastes (e.g. construction and demolition debris, organics); Maine has not

> DEP Response:  Some states have put disposal bans in place for certain wastes (e.g.construction/demolition debris and organics such as food scrap), a principal purpose of which is to increase the recycling rates of those wastes by eliminating the disposal option for handling.  

Although the Department has discussed the imposition of additional waste bans periodically, it has continued to conclude that for some of these waste streams the recycling infrastructure in Maine at this point is simply not sufficient statewide to preclude disposal as a handling option

>
Sticking with the definition passed by the corrupted bill
> 19. Comment:   Commenters support a modification to the proposed rule that would remove residues from incineration as waste not generated within the State, regardless of the source of the waste combusted.

Adding the phrase “ Environmental Justice”  but that’s about it
>
> Response: Public Law 2019 Chapter 619 (LD 401) modified the statutory definition of “waste generated within the State” to, in part, include: “Residue generated by an incineration facility or a recycling facility that is located within the State, regardless of whether the waste incinerated or processed by that facility was initially generated within the State or outside the State”. In its recommendation to the Board concerning the pending rulemaking petition, the Department is proposing that the regulatory definition of “waste generated within the State" be made consistent with statute.
>
> ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND EQUAL PROTECTION
>"
> DEP Response: Section 5.E.3 of the current rule is constructed similarly to the proposed language of Section 5.E.5 and states: The facility is not inconsistent with local, regional, or state waste collection, storage, transportation, processing, or disposal”.  This construction suggests a shift in the nature of the evidence necessary to make a finding with respect to the standard, allowing a positive finding unless evidence is submitted that 289-12-demonstrates an inconsistency. This approach seems appropriate in view of the issues addressed by these 2 standards. This change was not made in the Department's recommended draft."
DEP Response to Comments 20-23 and 25-28:
> The Department acknowledges the many comments submitted both in support of, and in opposition to, the proposed inclusion of “environmental justice” and “equal protection” as standards in the Public Benefit determination process for new/expanded waste disposal facilities  Each comment was reviewed and carefully considered. "

The Department proposes to modify 06-096 C.M.R. Chapter 400 to include “environmental justice” as a consideration in the Public Benefit determination process as proposed in the petition.  Although commenters opposing inclusion of the language in the rule argued that it was vague, and the absence of a detailed regulatory standard could lead to inconsistency in its application, the Department agrees with supporters of the proposed language who pointed out that there are a number of broad standards in the existing rule that are not accompanied by detailed regulatory provisions.  "

The Department is not recommending separate inclusion of the concept of “equal protection” as proposed in the petition since it appears to be redundant in view of the broad definition of “environmental justice” that is proposed.  Further, the Department is not recommending inclusion of protection of the “health and welfare of local communities” in the Public Benefit standard since this concept is already clearly incorporated into both statute and rule with respect to solid waste facilities.  06-096 C.M.R. c. 400(3)(D) states, in part, that:  “The Department shall issue a license for a  solid waste facility whenever it finds, based upon substantial evidence in the record, that the solid waste facility will not . . . constitute a hazard to health or welfare . . .” 

The Department does agree with commenters opposing inclusion of the new standard that Maine’s environmental standards are rigorous, must be met by all solid waste facilities, and protect all citizens equally. However, the Department finds that the specific inclusion of “environmental justice” in the rule appropriately highlights the importance of this principle and does not generally increase the regulatory burden of applicants. "

The Department also agrees with those commenting that environmental justice is a concept that should be considered in a broader context than just the Solid Waste Management Rules.  The Department is committed to further evaluating this topic and beginning development of an agency-wide environmental justice policy"


Dec 18, 2020

Upstream Watch files appeal of Maine's okay of Nordic AQ's permits

 On December 16, 2020 environmental group Upstream Watch filed an 80-C appeal of a recent Maine Board of Environmental Protection's  approval  of water and air pollution permits  for Nordic Aquafarms.  (Read appeal below) The company has proposed  building a large land based salmon farm in Belfast, Maine that would  take in water from Penobscot Bay  and discharge treated fish wastewater back into the bay.  Below, read the  28 page Upstream Watch appeal, and separately its attachments (PDFs)

Upstream Watch 80-C Superior Court appeal 12/16/20  28 pages.

Attachment A 

Attachment B

Attachment C

Attachment D

Attachment E

Attachment Maps

DEP memo NAF May 20- 21, 2020

Attachment. Service letters







Euro-waste spills into Penobscot Bay, gets woven into seaweed wrack

 From the December 16, 2020  edition of  The Guardian, UK 

''We're getting Europe's waste?' US hit by plastic debris lost from UK ship

Environmentalists question why waste washing up on Maine coast was being imported from Northern Ireland for energy production

Shredded plastic collected on Sears Island
Shredded plastic destined to be burned in a waste-to-electricity plant in Maine has been washing up on the shores of Sears Island. Photograph: Material Research
Seascape: the state of our oceans is supported by
About this content

Brightly coloured plastic debris from the UK has been washing up along the coast of Maine in the US after a shipment bound for incineration fell into the sea.

The plastic debris, part of a 10,000-tonne consignment from Re-Gen Waste, a company based in Newry, Northern Ireland, has infuriated environmentalists and locals surprised to learn that the north-eastern state of Maine is importing plastic from almost 3,000 miles away.

Volunteers struggling to clear the waste from the shoreline of Sears Island, alongside a company employed to tackle it, fear they are fighting a losing battle as more plastic washes up with every tide.

Politicians and environmentalists say the US, which is the world’s biggest producer of plastic waste, should not be importing more plastic. They are concerned about the potential effects on wildlife in Penobscot Bay, home to one of Maine’s first commercial lobster fisheries.

“This event was an unfortunate and preventable accident and speaks to a larger issue, that is, how we process trash,” Genevieve McDonald, a Democratic representative in the Maine legislature, said.

“We should not be in a position where any facility needs to import trash. This came as a surprise to me because I know how much plastic we create in the US.”

McDonald, who is a commercial lobster boat captain and sits on Maine’s marine resource committee, said she was also concerned about the effect of the waste on the area’s wildlife, as well as on the lobster fishery, “a cornerstone of our marine economy here in Maine”.

In a statement, Re-Gen Waste said it was “distressed” to learn of the “unacceptable and entirely preventable” incident. The bales of what it called “waste to energy fuel”, which is diverted from landfill, were being transferred from the MV Sider London cargo ship to Mack Port in Searsport during a storm on 2 December.

During the transfer, by Sprague Energy terminal, two bales fell into Penobscot Bay. One of the bales could not be retrieved, it said, and high winds blew the plastic on to the north-west side of Sears Island. The rest of the consignment was transferred to Penobscot Energy Recovery Company (Perc) in the town of Orrington, to be used to generate electricity.

The Re-Gen Waste statement said: “We have been active in the interim, working closely with Searsport’s town manager, Sprague Energy terminal and Penobscot Energy Recovery Co, to ensure that every measure possible is employed, to redress the situation.

“A crew from Clean Harbors in Hampden was deployed to clean up the plastic that accumulated on the north-west corner of Sears Island, and students from the Maine Ocean School were mobilised to do a further sweep of the shoreline last Friday.

Shredded plastic on the beach in Maine
Volunteers have been sweeping the area for debris. Photograph: Ethan Andrews

Re-Gen Waste said it had shipped between 80,000 and 100,000 tonnes of waste into Europe and across the world and this was the first time an “offloading incident” had been reported by a port. The Guardian contacted Sprague Energy and Perc for comment but neither has yet responded.

Ron Huber, a conservationist and executive director of Friends of Penobscot Bay, said he had already been concerned about waste from New York and other parts of New England coming to Maine. “Now we’re getting Europe’s waste as well? This is a real disincentive to reduce waste: ‘Oh we’ll just take your waste and burn it.’”

He said the area was important for wildlife, including moose and deer, and that the bay was host to fish nurseries.

“So many citizens are out there picking up the waste. But the whole thing is a comedy of errors. It shouldn’t have been a week before the agencies responded. They should have nets to make sure waste bales don’t fall into the sea.”

Jim Valette, an anti-waste campaigner who runs Material Research, a “low-profit” company, said the consignment was the biggest export to the US he had seen: “It’s usually going the other way. It’s outrageous it has come to us to clean up Europe’s mess.”

On average, 1,300 containers are lost at sea every year, according to the World Shipping Council.

From 1 January, controls on transboundary waste will be tightened under the Basel convention, a treaty covering waste shipments between nearly 190 governments, including the UK. The US has signed but not ratified the convention, but the regulations are expected to affect how it trades in plastic waste.

Dec 17, 2020

Maine government's sudden expansion of wind development - fishing industry responds.

The December 16, 2020 webinar about the state of Maine's latest offshore windpower initiative revealed an enormous change in plans. LISTEN BELOW TO AUDIO S OF GOVT & FISHFOLK  AT zoom meeting
Rather than 1-2 floating turbines off Monhegan, the state is now promoting 12 floating  "research turbines"  offshore the Sheepscot River as a 20 year "research" project -  selling power to the grid . Attendees mostly Midcoast fishfolk and reps of both the Maine Lobstering Union and the Maine Lobstermen's Association were  very skeptical of the state's plan as as presented by Celina Cunningham of the Governor's Energy Office and  DMR Deputy Commissioner Meredith Mendelson and the words of Chris Wissemann of Mitsubishi-owned offshore power wannabees Diamond Offshore Wind Development , 
1. Intro by Celia Cunningham, Governor's Energy Office 9 min 



Dec 15, 2020

Islesboro gets trashed with plastic Euro-waste

From Islesboro Island Trust 12/15/20
Plastic Waste from Ireland en route to the waste-to-energy incinerator in Orrington, Maine washes up on Islesboro

On a sunny December 2, 2020, with a brisk southerly breeze, Sprague Operating Resources dropped more than 2 tons of plastic waste next to the Mack Point terminal in Searsport while unloading a shipment of about 100 metric tons of what is called solid-recovered fuel [SRF - plastic that can’t be recycled that is processed for burning in facilities like the Penobscot Energy Company (PERC)] from the MV Sider London carrying this material from Re-Gen Waste in the United Kingdom to PERC.

John Kerr photo

Sprague did not report the spill at that time. The plastic spill was not known until six days later on December 8 when someone walking on Sears Island’s western beach noticed a huge amount of plastic, some in highly compressed chunks, mixed with seaweed along about a half-mile of the high tide line. The walker contacted journalist Ethan Andrews and the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Andrews then broke the story to public media.

After media and DEP notification, Sprague launched a clean-up effort by contracting Clean Harbors from Hampden, Maine, who reportedly then sent a small clean-up crew to Sears Island. Hundreds of volunteers from Friends of Sears Island, the Maine Ocean School in Searsport, Upstream Watch and elsewhere provided significant additional clean-up help.

IIT learned about this plastic spill on Wednesday, December 9, after reading the brief Facebook report from Andrews. In addition to discussing this with Jon Kerr, retired biology teacher, IIT Trustee and IIT Preserves management assistant who I knew to be deeply concerned about all plastics in the world’s oceans but especially about microplastics, I walked the western shore of the Turtle Head Preserve to see whether any of the spill had washed ashore there.

Thankfully, none of this material could be seen along that stretch of Islesboro’s shore. I made two subsequent surveys here that did not reveal any of the spill at Turtle Head.

However, on Sunday, December 13, while walking the stretch of beach associated with the Red House Farm conservation easement that was given to IIT by Mrs. Owsley in 1988, Jon Kerr and Laine Alexander found some of the Irish plastic mixed with seaweed along what Jon described as an approximately 35- to 40-foot-long area of their beach. They looked both north and south of this location but did not find any more.

Jon immediately contacted IIT. IIT helped put him in touch with DEP and Ethan Andrews. Jon collected a few pieces of the shredded plastic and took pictures.

Monday, Jon wrote, “I talked to DEP this morning; was put through to three different people. Finally, was told that the cargo port was in charge of the clean-up and to contact them. I called Josh Littlefield, [Sprague manager] who is in charge of overseeing the clean-up, and left a message that the plastic is making an appearance on our shore.” Later in the day Jon reported that Littlefield “is going to try to have someone come out tomorrow [Tuesday, December 15] to look at a possible plastic clean-up plan.”

The stretch of beach where Jon and Laine found the plastic material is located on what chart’s refer to as Sprague’s Cove, roughly opposite Sprague’s Ledge and a little south of Barley Ledge. The location is not readily accessible by boat and is a considerable distance from Keller Point Road, the closest public way.

According to Friends of Sears Island President Susan White, who spent time on Sears Island helping to clean-up the plastic debris and with whom we have been in communication regarding this plastic spill, hand-picking the thousands, perhaps millions of very small pieces entangled in the seaweed is incredibly inefficient and cannot reasonably be expected to retrieve all of the pieces before continued dispersal in Penobscot Bay. Susan asks, “Who has the authority to determine when the [clean-up] work will be complete?”

IIT and others are also asking, “Where else in the Bay might this plastic be found?” Jon Kerr suggested using nets behind boats to trawl for particles. Jon spoke with Shey Conover, also an IIT Trustee and co-owner of Marshal Cove Mussels and Islesboro Marine Enterprises, about this possible attempt to assess dispersal through the Bay and she concurred, indicating that their business boats might be able to undertake just such a search through the water.

Meanwhile, The Telegraph in the UK published a piece today (December 15) titled “UK plastic waste washes up on unspoiled Maine island after falling into the sea.” FOSI’s Susan White, during a Penobscot Watershed Coalition meeting Monday to discuss plans for a watershed conference in late 2021, stepped away from her Zoom connection to take an interview from The Guardian.

The spill can be characterized as an international event of international concern.

In July this past summer, researchers from the Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences released a report on how microplastics affect lobster larvae, concluding that young larvae get microplastic fibers trapped under their shells that inhibit respiration, potentially leading to death. Older lobster larvae ingest microplastic particles, which pose health consequences for those lobsters as well as for humans who may consume them.

he Shaw Institute located just east of Islesboro in Blue Hill, Maine is a global forerunner in microplastic research. According to the Shaw Institute website (https://www.shawinstitute.org/focus/plastics-and-microplastics), their research “detected staggering amounts of microplastic fragments in water samples collected from Blue Hill and Penobscot Bays – on average, 17 plastic fragments in every liter of seawater.” Further, the Shaw Institute found significant numbers of microplastic pieces in oysters and mussels. Shaw notes that, “We are not only concerned for the health of our marine species, but by better understanding microplastics, we can help protect the health of seafood consumers.”

And all of the Shaw Institute research, of course, came before this current, massive plastic dump in Penobscot Bay immediately adjacent to and directly impacting Islesboro.

We expect an Ethan Andrews investigative piece on the spill and its effect on Islesboro later today or tomorrow in the FreePress (https://freepressonline.com/). We will continue to keep you updated as this evolving issue unfolds.

Steve Miller
Islesboro Islands Trust | P.O. Box 182, 376 West Bay Road, Islesboro, ME 04848

Dec 12, 2020

Penobscot Bay Spill Responders: Who they are. What they do.

When Maine suffers an oil or chemical or waste spill that enters or threatens to enter & harm a river or bay, a web of Emergency Responders is on hand to provide the expertise in nearly any situation. Below let's look at who they are and what they do in and around Maine's biggest bay.

COUNTY LEVEL: Each county has both a Local Emergency Planning AGENCY and a Local Emergency Planning COMMITTEE.
These are county level organizations, required under federal and state law to coordinate hazardous materials response preparedness activities. LEPC Purposes and Membership

* Waldo County Local Emergency Planning AGENCY
* Waldo County Local Emergency Planning COMMITTEE (LEPC)

* Knox County Local Emergency Planning COMMITTEE (LEPC)
* Knox County Emergency Planning AGENCY

* Hancock County Local Emergency Planning AGENCY
Hancock County Local Emergency Planning COMMITTEE (LEPC)

* All Maine County Emergency Planning agencies

STATE LEVEL
Maine Emergency Management Agency
MEMA and Human Caused Hazards

* State Emergency Response Commission (SERC)
Contact: Faith Staples 207.557.3675 faith.e.staples@maine.gov
SERC Duties
SERC October 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes

Maine DEP Spill Response _ Maine Spill Response Statute

STATE/FEDERAL * Maine Port Safety Forum Minutes of PSF

FEDERAL U.S. National Response Team (NRT) NRT "provides technical assistance, resources and coordination on preparedness, planning, response and recovery activities for emergencies involving hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants, oil, and weapons of mass destruction in natural and technological disasters and other environmental incidents of national significance."

Nov 26, 2020

Two oppos to Nordic's salmon tankfarm detail BEP's flawed reasoning in letters to the editor.

Two letters to the editor that were published November 26, 2020, The first is by Amy Grant, President of Upstream Watch; the second by Belfast citizen Lawrence Reichard

1. Questions remain in Nordic permit process
Nordic Aquafarms’ permitting process with the Department of Environmental Protection is far from over. Board of Environmental Protection member Susan Lessard stated that “this isn’t a period at the end of a sentence but more like three dots.” Nordic has a very steep slope ahead of them to meet the multiple conditions the Department of Environmental Protection requested. Given the opportunity for appeals on many of the permit conditions, this process will drag on for years.

We look forward to getting this in front of a judge and will be filing our appeal in the coming days. The BEP has granted permits that were incomplete and instead is letting Nordic fill in the blanks after the fact. That approach is both illogical and illegal.

The DEP has asked for multiple conditions which would normally be required before permits get approved. Board members questioned the wisdom of applying conditions at the same time as issuing permits, but in the end all votes were unanimous without discussion, suggesting that the vote was predetermined.

At least 12 of the conditions on the site location of development application permit open the door for further appeals that require public hearings. Upstream is fortunate to have a strong science-based team in place to see this process through, however long that may take. Upstream will continue to stand with the need for much more conclusive data and clear answers before construction begins.

The law says that conditions can only be used for minor and easily fixable issues and they are not interchangeable with permit requirements. Permit conditions are allowed to assure compliance with the permit, not to qualify for a permit after the project is constructed. Nordic still has a lot of questions to answer.
By Amy Grant, President, Upstream Watch, Belfast

===========================================================

2. The BEP's fatal flaws
Last week the Maine Board of Environmental Protection approved permits for Nordic Aquafarms' industrial fish farm.

In its decision, BEP ignored and violated many of its own rules and regulations by not requiring Nordic to perform legally mandated studies. Apparently the board is happy to fly blind with the future of Belfast Bay and the woods, wetlands and wildlife habitat Nordic seeks to destroy.

The BEP decision has at least two fatal flaws. Before it can even apply for BEP permits, Nordic must by law establish title, right and interest to all lands it intends to use, but BEP chose to completely ignore very substantial problems with Nordic's TRI. It's ludicrous to rule that Nordic has sufficient TRI while Nordic's TRI is being litigated in court — especially when a Maine court recently ruled that active litigation by definition obviates TRI. The BEP chose to utterly ignore this.

The second flaw is the question of Nordic's competence — or incompetence. As an official BEP intervenor who has repeatedly documented significant Nordic incompetencies, I was barred from addressing these incompetencies in my testimony.

This, too, is ludicrous. As city of Belfast attorney Bill Kelly has urged the Belfast Planning Board to do, the BEP focused exclusively on the viability of Nordic's design, not the company's ability to actually follow that design competently. That's like buying a perfectly viable new Ford and then handing the keys to your 4-year-old child.

Perhaps the worst of all this is that no BEP member lives in Belfast or Northport. Thus none of them will have to live with the consequences of allowing Nordic to daily spew at least 7.7 million gallons of effluent into Belfast Bay, to annually devour at least 630 million gallons of our freshwater, and to destroy our woods, wetlands, wildlife habitat and hiking trails.

With its Nordic decision, the BEP has failed to protect our environment and has failed the people of Maine — all for the sake of wealthy corporate executives and stockholders, and high-end consumers. Let's hope our courts don't follow suit.
By Lawrence Reichard, Belfast

Nov 25, 2020

Casella Wastes' Juniper Ridge Landfill leachate is it safe?

 JRL's recent letter to the editor  declared the company's landfill leachates, tanker-trucked daily to a wastewater treatment plant  on the shore of Penobscot River in Old Town  meet all regulatory requirements.

As clean water advocates , from statewide NGOs to the Penobscot Indian Nation, note,   Casella's hastily written letter to the editor from Casella's Toni King is more  remarkable for what it doesn't say than what it does about its chemical brew.

Is Juniper Ridge Landfill leachate polluting the Penobscot River? You wouldn't know from Ms King's letter.

King's letter is filled with comforting phrases: "as required by law"... "carefully regulates"..."limits concentrations"..."requires monitoring"... "all applicable licensing criteria"... "compliant with state law".. 

But those could be used to describe  nuclear waste, or the tainted leachate from GAC Chemical's. shoreline waste dumps

Also along the way: there are so many other polluters, ours is such a minor portion. This reminds me of something then-

DEP Commissioner David Littell said early in the process. I don't have the exact words in front of me, but the essence was: The DEP does not exist to eliminate pollution; its job is to license pollution. Take this wherever it leads. Thanks to all for the work you are doing. Paul S. 207 907 0906

Casella Waste calls Penobscot Nation "activist group". Says landfill's leachate treated enuf before pumped into Penobscot River

 As printed in the Bangor Daily News  11/22/2020

Landfill and leachate 
By Toni M. King, Casella Waste Systems

 An activist group is claiming that leachate from the state-owned landfill in Old Town is discharged — untreated — into the Penobscot River. This is absolutely false.

 “Leachate” is liquid that passes through solid waste in a landfill. Liquid in waste and rainwater that passes through waste is captured within the landfill, conveyed to a secure tank and transported offsite to a treatment plant. 

 The state-owned landfill is highly engineered with double liners, leak detection systems and a sophisticated liquid conveyance system. It contracts with the Old Town mill for treatment and disposal of its leachate, as required by law. 

 The Department of Environmental Protection carefully regulates every step in this process. It limits concentrations in discharges and requires monitoring for a range of parameters. The state-owned landfill and the Old Town Mill are fully compliant with these requirements. 

 The DEP recently reviewed the landfill’s operations relative to future leachate disposal. It concluded that all applicable licensing criteria for proposed waste discharge were met and the discharge won’t lower the quality of the Penobscot River. 

 There are five licensed wastewater treatment plants north of Old Town discharging to the Penobscot River. There are 11 more discharging further downstream. The amount attributable to the state-owned landfill – all of it treated – is 1/100,000th of the total. 

Wastewater and leachate are collected and treated to ensure the safety of our environment. Disposal from the state-owned landfill is compliant with state law, and a miniscule portion of the overall discharges permitted to the river. 

 Toni M. King 
 Region Engineer 
 Casella Waste Systems

Nov 21, 2020

Nordic Aqua Farms state permits: final BEP hearing 11/19/2020 AUDIO mp3s


On November 19, 2020 Maine Board of Environmental Protection held its regular meeting by ZOOM. One of the topics at the meeting: Nordic Aquafarms  DEP permits.  Listen to selections from the meeting

NORDIC

Closing arguments at start of hearing   Full 11/1920  BEP  Nordic hearing 2hrs

1.Closing Arguments_Intro and Dacid Lossee Upstream Watch 10min30sec

2. Barry Costa_Pierce U New England_8min33sec.mp3

3 Eric Heim NAF  6min 6sec

Closing argument Kim Tucker MLU  2min11sec

5. Michael Lannon Northport Village Corp (NVC) 3min 49sec   

DISCUSSIONS

Sue Lessard discussion DEP response to plant emergencies 16min

Sue Lessard 2. Discussion DEP oversight of Special  Conditions  6min23sec


Another topic at BEP meeting   NECEC Powerline Plan - Listen to 15min discussion at Maine BEP's 11/19/20 meeting, led by BEP executive analyst Bill Hinkel. TOPIC NRCM's appeal to BEP against transfer of ownership of planned powerline to new corporate LLC . What BEP decides.

Nov 11, 2020

Penobscot Bay Report 10/31/20 Pesticides & Maine Pot Grows. Landfills, landbased aquaculture

  Maine Board of Pesticides Control PC received a letter at its September meeting from Professor John Jemison, a soil and water quality specialist with the U-Maine Cooperative Extension, with concerns over the inadequate regulation of pesticide use on Maine-grown\ marijuana. Here is the letter https://www.maine.gov/dacf/php/pesticides/documents2/bd_mtgs/sep20/pesticides-and-cannabis-production.pdf


MICROBIA. Oldest of Earth's communities gets scrutiny. 2005 - 2020

Links to Pub-Med abstracts on scientific journal articles relating to microbiology and microsociology, quorum sensing and biofilm formation & excerpts from the abstracts.

2020

2020 Quorum sensing regulates 'swim-or-stick' lifestyle in the phycosphere " Interactions between phytoplankton and bacteria play major roles in global biogeochemical cycles and oceanic nutrient fluxes. These interactions occur in the microenvironment surrounding phytoplankton cells, known as the phycosphere. 

Bacteria in the phycosphere use either chemotaxis or attachment to benefit from algal excretions. Both processes are regulated by quorum sensing (QS), a cell-cell signalling mechanism that uses small infochemicals to coordinate bacterial gene expression"

2020 Inhibiting bacterial cooperation is an evolutionarily robust anti-biofilm strategy  " Bacteria commonly form dense biofilms encased in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Biofilms are often extremely tolerant to antimicrobials but their reliance on shared EPS may also be a weakness as social evolution theory predicts that inhibiting shared traits can select against resistance. 

Here we show that extracellular polymeric substances extruded as...biofilms is a cooperative trait whose benefit is shared among cells, and that EPS inhibition reduces both cell attachment and antimicrobial tolerance. 

We then compare an EPS inhibitor to conventional antimicrobials in an evolutionary experiment. While resistance against conventional antimicrobials rapidly evolves, we see no evolution of resistance to EPS inhibition. 

We further show that a resistant strain is outcompeted by a susceptible strain under EPS inhibitor treatment, explaining why resistance does not evolve. Our work suggests that targeting cooperative traits is a viable solution to the problem of antimicrobial resistance."


2019

2019  Surviving as a Community: Antibiotic Tolerance and Persistence in Bacterial Biofilms  "we review recent progress aimed at understanding the mechanical features that drive biofilm resilience and the biofilm formation process at single-cell resolution. We discuss findings regarding mechanisms underlying bacterial tolerance and persistence in biofilms and how these phenotypes are linked to antibiotic resistance. New strategies for combatting tolerance and persistence in biofilms and possible methods for biofilm eradication are highlighted to inspire future development."

2019  Quorum sensing in Vibrio spp.: the complexity of multiple signalling molecules in marine and aquatic environments  "Quorum sensing (QS) is a density-dependent mechanism enabling bacteria to coordinate their actions via the release of small diffusible molecules named autoinducers (AIs).  Vibrio spp. are able to adapt to changing environmental conditions by using a wide range of physiological mechanisms ...... Cell-to-cell communication controls many of their vital functions such as niche colonization, survival strategies. "

2019 Big Impact of the Tiny: Bacteriophage-Bacteria Interactions in Biofilms  "Bacteriophages (phage viruses) have been shaping bacterial ecology and evolution for millions of years, for example, by selecting for defence strategies. Evidence supports that bacterial biofilm formation is one such strategy and that biofilm-mediated protection against phage infection depends on maturation and composition of the extracellular matrix. Interestingly, studies have revealed that phages can induce and strengthen biofilms."


2019  Behavioral heterogeneity in quorum sensing can stabilize social cooperation in microbial populations  " Microbial communities are susceptible to the public goods dilemma, whereby individuals can gain an advantage within a group by utilizing, but not sharing the cost of producing, public goods. 

In bacteria, the development of quorum sensing (QS) can establish a cooperation system in a population by coordinating the production of costly and sharable extracellular products (public goods). Cooperators ..... are vulnerable to being undermined by QS-deficient defectors that escape from QS but benefit from the cooperation of others. 

Although microorganisms have evolved several mechanisms to resist cheating invasion in the public goods game, it is not clear why cooperators frequently coexist with defectors and how they form a relatively stable equilibrium during evolution."

"QS-directed social cooperation can select a conditional defection strategy prior to the emergence of QS-mutant defectors, depending on resource availability. Conditional defectors represent a QS-inactive state of wild type (cooperator) individual and can invade QS-activated cooperators by adopting a cheating strategy, and then revert to cooperating when there are abundant nutrient supplies irrespective of the exploitation of QS-mutant defector."

 "[T]he incorporation of conditional defection strategy into the framework of iterated public goods game with sound punishment mechanism can lead to the coexistence of cooperator, conditional defector, and defector in a rock-paper-scissors dynamics."


2018

2018  Maximizing Growth Yield and Dispersal via Quorum Sensing Promotes Cooperation in Vibrio Bacteria  "Quorum sensing (QS) is a form of bacterial chemical communication that regulates cellular phenotypes, including certain cooperative behaviors, in response to environmental and demographic changes. Despite the existence of proposed mechanisms that stabilize QS against defector exploitation, it is unclear if or how QS cooperators can proliferate in some model systems in populations mostly consisting of defectors. 

We predicted that growth in fragmented subpopulations could allow QS cooperators to invade a QS defector population. This could occur despite cooperators having lower relative fitnesses than defectors due to favored weighting of genotypes that produce larger populations of bacteria"

2018  Coumarin: a novel player in microbial quorum sensing and biofilm formation inhibition ". An intricate cell-cell communication system termed quorum sensing (QS) and the coordinated multicellular behaviour of biofilm formation have both been identified"...."QS systems allow bacteria to adapt rapidly to harsh conditions, and are known to promote the formation of antibiotic tolerant biofilm communities. It is well known that biofilm is a recalcitrant mode of growth and it also increases bacterial resistance to conventional antibiotics..... Reports have highlighted the potential role of coumarins as alternative therapeutic strategies based on their ability to block the QS signalling systems and to inhibit the formation of biofilms in clinically relevant pathogens."
2018 Archaeal biofilm formation  "Biofilms are structured and organized communities of microorganisms that represent one of the most successful forms of life on Earth. Bacterial biofilms have been studied in great detail, and many molecular details are known about the processes that govern bacterial biofilm formation, however, archaea are ubiquitous in almost all habitats on Earth and can also form biofilms. In recent years, insights have been gained into the development of archaeal biofilms, how archaea communicate to form biofilms and how the switch from a free-living lifestyle to a sessile lifestyle is regulated."
2017
2017 An Update on the Sociomicrobiology of Quorum Sensing in Gram-Negative Biofilm Development   "Bacteria are social creatures that are able to interact and coordinate behaviors with each other in a multitude of ways. The study of such group behaviors in microbes was coined “sociomicrobiology” in 2005. Two such group behaviors in bacteria are quorum sensing (QS) and biofilm formation. At a very basic level, QS is the ability to sense bacterial density via cell-to-cell signaling using self-produced signals called autoinducers, and biofilms are aggregates of cells that are attached to one another via a self-produced, extracellular matrix. 
"Formation of mature biofilms. In addition to attachment, QS regulates other aspects of biofilm formation, including accumulation of biofilm biomass, biofilm structure, and the dispersal of biofilm cells."Since cells in biofilm aggregates are in close proximity, biofilms represent an ecologically relevant environment for QS."
2016

2016 Editorial: Signals to sociality: how microbial communication fashions communities  "[M]ost bacteria exist in nature in multifaceted communities that are often associated with living and non-living surfaces. Within these communities, bacteria are exchanging information with other bacteria and other organisms, including eukaryotes, to generate coordinated behaviors. 

Central to this microbial information exchange is communication between cells. The act of communication exists in many forms and is often considered essential for organized group behaviors between individuals and for the development of multicellular organisms.

2016 Editorial: Signals to sociality: how microbial communic fashions communities " "[M]ost bacteria exist in nature in multifaceted communities that are often associated with living and non-living surfaces. Within these communities, bacteria are exchanging information with other bacteria and other organisms, including eukaryotes, to generate coordinated behaviors. "

2016 Quorum sensing is a language of chemical signals and plays an ecological role  in algal-bacterial interactions   "Algae are ubiquitous in the marine environment, and the ways in which they interact with bacteria are of particular interest in marine ecology field. The interactions between primary producers and bacteria impact the physiology of both partners, alter the chemistry of their environment, and shape microbial diversity."

2016 Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in the Phycosphere of Phytoplankton: a Case of Chemical Interactions in Ecology  "The interactions between bacteria and phytoplankton regulate many important biogeochemical reactions in the marine environment, including those in the global carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles. At the microscopic level, it is now well established that important consortia of bacteria colonize the phycosphere, the immediate environment of phytoplankton cells. In this microscale environment, abundant bacterial cells are organized in a structured biofilm."


2015

2015 Quorum Sensing in Marine Microbial Environments  "Quorum sensing (QS) was first observed in a marine bacterium nearly four decades ago...Only in the past decade has there been a rise in interest in the role that QS plays in the ocean. 

"It has become clear that QS.... is involved in important processes within the marine carbon cycle, in the health of coral reef ecosystems, and in trophic interactions between a range of eukaryotes and their bacterial associates. "

"The most well-studied QS systems in the ocean occur in surface-attached (biofilm) communities...."   "QS is highly sensitive to the chemical and biological makeup of the environment and may respond to anthropogenic change, including ocean acidification and rising sea surface temperatures."


2012

2012 Interactions in Bacterial Biofilm Development: A Structural Perspective  "A community-based life style is the normal mode of growth and survival for many bacterial species. These cellular accretions or biofilms are initiated upon recognition of solid phases by cell surface exposed adhesive moieties. 

Further cell-cell interactions, cell signalling and bacterial replication leads to the establishment of dense populations encapsulated in a mainly self-produced extracellular matrix; this comprises a complex mixture of macromolecules. These fascinating architectures protect the inhabitants from radiation damage, dehydration, pH fluctuations and antimicrobial compounds"


2011

2011 "From Koch's Postulates to Socio-microbiology"  "The ability of bacteria to intercommunicate and process information about resource availability and the health status of the host has led to the concept of bacteria behaving like a social group. The study of social networks developed among bacteria in their natural habitats is called sociomicrobiology. From "Koch's Postulates to Socio-microbiology."

2011 The New Science of Sociomicrobiology and the realm of synthetic materials and systems ecology  "We need to remain cognizant that bacterial cells are individual organisms involved in complex social interactions. So not only do we need to think about systems and synthetic biology from a cellular perspective, but we need to think about systems and synthetic ecology too."

2011 Territoriality in Proteus: advertisement and aggression "Members of the bacterial species Proteus mirabilis are capable of rapid swarming over a hard agar surface. Swarming colonies display a striking phenotype in which a visible boundary forms between swarms of different strains. In contrast, boundaries do not arise between two swarms of a single strain (Figure 1). This behavior is a demonstration that P. mirabilis swarms are capable of territoriality and self versus non-self recognition"

"At the cellular level self vs non-self recognition is a behavior conserved throughout biology, from bacteria to animals and to vertebrate immune systems. The puzzle of how cells or organisms recognize and differentiate self from non-self is fundamental to fields as far from each other as immunology and ecology. 

The boundary formation between P. mirabilis is clearly a complex interplay of cell-to-cell communication and population development. In boundary formation, there is not only social recognition but also territorial competition between approaching Proteus strains. It seems likely that recognition and antagonism both play a role in the overall boundary formation process, but antagonism is not required for boundary formation. Molecular details of the dance leading to boundary formation remain to be determined.

2008

2008 Sociomicrobiology: The evolution of quorum sensing in bacterial biofilms  "Biofilms are surface-bound aggregates of bacteria that are held together by a matrix of extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs). Quorum sensing often controls the synthesis and secretion of EPSs, but although some bacteria switch on EPS production at high cell densities in biofilms, other bacteria switch it off. Nadell et al. used a model that simulates the growth of a simple biofilm to simulate competition between strains that had different EPSs and quorum-sensing phenotypes. This revealed that switching quorum sensing and EPSs off allows bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa to compete better in environments in which competition is prolonged and intense..."

2005

2005 Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol 13: 27-33  [B]iofilms and quorum sensing represent two areas in which microbiologists focus on social aspects of bacteria. .....We believe that these two aspects of bacterial behavior represent a small part of the social repertoire of bacteria. Bacteria exhibit many social activities and they represent a model for dissecting social behavior at the genetic level. Therefore, we introduce the term 'sociomicrobiology'. "

"A clear challenge facing the field is to determine what parameters of a biofilm community influence the onset of quorum sensing and subsequent patterns of gene expression. Another key challenge is to determine the functional consequences of quorum sensing in a biofilm community...... Finally, the role of quorum sensing in mixed species systems remains to be explored. Does interspecies signaling occur frequently in mixed species systems, or do signal consuming organisms severely limit the extent of signaling that occurs? The answer to these questions will undoubtedly provide some expected results as well as surprises."

Investigations of the role quorum sensing plays in biofilm
systems for different organisms and how quorum sensing
works mechanistically in a biofilm community remain in
their infancy. A clear challenge facing the field is to
determine what parameters of a biofilm community
influence the onset of quorum sensing and subsequent
patterns of gene expression. Another key challenge is to
determine the functional consequences of quorum sensing
in a biofilm community. Does induction of quorum sensing
influence the pathogenic potential of biofilm communities
of some species, or perhaps alter the antimicrobial
tolerance of the biofilm? Finally, the role of quorum
sensing in mixed species systems remains to be explored.
Does interspecies signaling occur frequently in mixed
species systems, or do signal consuming organisms
severely limit the extent of signaling that occurs? The
answer to these questions will undoubtedly provide some
expected results as well as surprise
2002
Small Talk: Cell to cell Communication in Bacteria  Bonnie Bassler  "In a process called quorum sensing, groups of bacteria communicate with one another to coordinate their behavior and function like a multicellular organism. "
"Quorum sensing-controlled behaviors are those that only occur when bacteria are at high cell population densities. These behaviors are ones that are unproductive when undertaken by an individual bacterium but become effective by the simultaneous action of a group of cells. For example, quorum sensing regulates bioluminescence, virulence factor expression, biofilm formation, sporulation, and mating. "
"Quorum sensing is achieved through the production, release, and subsequent detection of and response to threshold concentrations of signal molecules called autoinducers. The accumulation of a stimulatory concentration of an extracellular autoinducer can only occur when a sufficient number of cells, a “quorum,” is present. "