Search

Aug 28, 2021

For BEP links are not enough


Chair Draper noted that the next item on the agenda is an appeal of a Clean Water Act related permit for which certain Board members may not participate, pursuant to Title 38 Section 341-C(8)(A). Chair Draper designated Mr. Duchesne to preside over the remainder of the meeting. Board members Draper, Lessard, and Dubois recused themselves and left the meeting. 

4. Appeal of General Permit for Discharge of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4 General Permit) by Friends of Casco Bay (decision) 

Staff: Gregg Wood, Bureau of Water Quality 

Mr. Hinkel introduced the appeal by summarizing Friends of Casco Bay’s (FOCB) objections to the Commissioner’s decision and the procedure for deciding an appeal, including the Board’s consideration of and vote on whether or not to hold a hearing in response to FOCB’s request for a hearing. 

Mr. Hinkel noted that the U.S. EPA Region I; the Bangor Area Stormwater Group; the Interlocal Stormwater Working Group and the Southern Maine Stormwater Working Group; and Conservation Law Foundation submitted comments on the appeal. The U.S. EPA’s comments to the Department stated 018 Board of Environmental Protection June 17, 2021 Draft Pending Board Approval Page 5 of 6 that the final MS4 General Permit contains modifications from the draft General Permit that are inconsistent with the Clean Water Act and implementing regulations. The Bangor Area Stormwater Group, the Interlocal Stormwater Working Group, and the Southern Maine Stormwater Working Group’s comments to the Board were in opposition to FOCB’s appeal. Conservation Law Foundation’s comments to the Board were in support of FOCB’s appeal and the comments by the U.S. EPA Region I. 

Mr. Hinkel noted that FOCB did not offer proposed supplemental evidence in its appeal. However, the appeal includes references to documents that are not in the Department’s licensing record, such as a report entitled “Scientific Assessment of Climate Change and its Effects in Maine,” Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems permits issued for the states of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, and a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency document entitled “Compendium of MS4 Permitting Approaches.” 

Prior to the Board’s consideration of the appeal, the Presiding Officer ruled that all references to documents such as these, which are neither within the Department’s record nor attached to the appeal as proposed supplemental evidence, are struck and will not be considered by the Board. 

Mr. Hinkel also noted that the Presiding Officer struck all electronic links provided in the appeal, and that the Presiding Officer admitted Interlocal Stormwater Working Group and the Southern Maine Stormwater Working Group’s proposed supplemental evidence Attachment 2–DEP emails regarding Chapter 500 updates.

Casco Baykeeper Ivy Frignoca discussed FOCB’s objections and challenges to the Commissioner's decision. 

Attorney Brian Rayback, representing the Interlocal Stormwater Working Group and the Southern Maine Stormwater Working Group, addressed the issues raised on appeal by FOCB. 

City of Lewiston Project Engineer John Kuchinski commented on the appeal. No other members of the public commented on the appeal. 

 Department staff Gregg Wood presented the proposed Board Order and answered Board questions. Department staff’s recommendations were that the Board remand the Commissioner’s Order to the Commissioner for further proceedings to modify Part IV.C.5.b and Part IV.E of the Final Permit. Assistant Attorney General Laura Jensen noted that the proposed Board Order contains a typographical error in the reference to Section IV.B.5.b. Mr. Wood confirmed that the correct reference should be to Section IV.C.5.b. 

Ms. Frignoca offered a rebuttal to support her arguments on appeal following the staff presentation. 019 Board of Environmental Protection June 17, 2021 Draft Pending Board Approval Page 6 of 6 

The Board voted (4-0-3-0) on a motion by Steve Pelletier and seconded by Robert Sanford to deny FOCB’s request to hold a hearing on the issues raised on appeal. Mark Draper, Mark Dubois, and Susan Lessard recused themselves and were not present for the vote. 

The vote was taken pursuant to 38 M.R.S. § 341-D and 06-096 C.M.R. 2, § 24. 

 Following deliberations, the Board voted (4-0-3-0) on a motion by James Parker and seconded by Steve Pelletier to accept the staff recommendation, with an amendment to correct the reference to Part IV.C.5.b of the MS4 General Permit in the Board Order proposed by staff, to remand the Commissioner’s Order to the Commissioner for further proceedings to modify Part IV.C.5, Part IV.E, and the Response to Comments portion of the Final Permit. 

The vote was taken pursuant to 38 M.R.S. § 341-D and 06-096 C.M.R. 2, § 24(G). Mark Draper, Mark Dubois, and Susan Lessard recused themselves and were not present for the vote. 

(The meeting adjourned at approximately 2:00 p.m.)

Aug 23, 2021

Penobscot Bay History September 1 1994: A plume is a plume is a ...BLOOM?

Conservation pilot Rudy Engholm took this photo of a plume emanating from Delta Chemical  September 1, 1994, while on a routine mission. When the photo and a report was  forwarded to Maine DEP, the agency inquired of the company.  Based on Delta Chemical's response. DEP concluded the plume was from  the "drainage of 2 old facility ponds (marsh sheens/algae)." See below

Bureau of Remediation and 
Waste Management

Spill Report Info. Source: HOSS Hazardous & Oil Spill System

Spill Number: B-567-1994
Report Status: Final Report
MCD Town: SEARSPORT

Primary Responder: ROBERT RANDALL

Subject/Owner: DELTA CHEMICALS, INC. 

I. EVENT

SPILL INFO
Type: Non-Oil, Non-Hazardous Incident
Source:  Cause: Discharge - Deliberate/Other
Spill Date/Time: 09/21/1994

Reporter Type/Detection Method Citizen Complaint
Reported Date/Time: 09/22/1994

Subject/Spiller
DELTA CHEMICALS, INC.
KIDDER POINT ROAD
SEARSPORT ME 04974

Primary Responder and Other Employees
Contact(s): ROBERT RANDALL (Primary Responder)
Comment: No Further Response Action Expected

II. SITE
Location Type: Business - Industrial {ID}
Name: DELTA CHEMICALS, INC.
Street Address: KIDDER POINT ROAD
MCD Town: SEARSPORT
Spill Point: UTM North 4923482.00  UTM East 509722.00
Wells and Media Affected : 0 
Media Affected: Land {L}
Tanks Involved: NONE

III. CLEANUP
Product Reported: Unspecified Oil {80}
Products Found/Amount Spilled: Algae Blooms/Plant Pollen Sheens {52} - 0.00
Material Recovered: NONE
Recovery/Treatment Method: NONE
Cleanup DTREE:
Disposal Information: Drainage of 2 old facility ponds (marsh sheens/algae).

IV. NARRATIVE   
V.ATTACHMENTS 



































Aug 13, 2021

Belfast City Council 8/12/21 special hearing on taking tidal conservation land for Nordic's proposed tankfarm waste pipeline.

On August 12th the City of Belfast held a briefing, public hearing , council discussion then vote   on the proposal to exert eminent domain  and seize the intertidal flats owned by longtime landowner Jeffrey Mabee et al.   Have a listen or download mp3s of the meeting


HOW IT WENT The meeting begins with a brief introduction, Then comes  a 50 minute presentation by  city attorney William  Kelly, spinning the permit review history of this project in support  of exerting  eminent domain. 

The hearing next switches to a two hour  public hearing (each speaker awarded 3 minutes) most challenging attorney Kelly's statements, but some supportive of seizing the land (names in red ink, below). Some, as in Ms Braybrook's  dramatic readings of  anonymous testifiers,  may have violated the hearing rules that all submitters of testimony.comments be ID'd.  

Public Speakers 8/12/21   
Remote Speakers
Paul Bernacki  OPPOSED
Allen Cohen  Winterport  OPPOSED
Andrew Plessner STANDISH   SUPPORT
David Perkins  L'ville  OPPOSED notes fishing
David Smith Belfast retired teacher OPPOSED
Dick Swain  OPPOSED 
Jeffrey Mabee Belfast.    OPPOSED
Jeff Limlin, Belfast  SUPPORTS
Glenn Montgomery Belfast NEUTRAL/ SUPPORTS
Jeffrey Bast, Northport/Bayside OPPOSED
Karen Estie  SUPPORTS
Kathryn Shagas  Belfast OPPOSED
Kathy Hayes/ SUPPORTS 
Diane Braybrook  SUPPORTS - 10 Phantom quotes 
Lily Piel belfast opposed
Ron Huber  Belfast  opposed 
Seth Thayer Northport SUPPORT 
Steve Byers Waldo   OPPOSED 
Suzanne Stone Belfast   OPPOSED
Zafra Whitcomb Belfast    SUPPORTS
There were 65 in the Zoom Queue. Many only there as listeners not testifiers.

LIVE SPEAKERS AT MEETING 16 ALL OPPOSED
Janie Philips Opposed
Amy Grant, Belfast Opposed
Mike Samway Bayside in 1940s Opposed
Kim Tucker, Opposed
Debbie Smith, Opposed
Christopher Grodin, Belfast  Opposed animal cruelty
Deborah Capwell,  Belfast  Opposed
Jane Giles, Belfast. Reads joint letter of Tozier Street residents opposed to em domain
Walden Merkel,   Belfast   Opposed
Jim Merkel, Belfast Opposed
Frances Pan(?), Belfast  Opposed
 Christopher Hyk, Jr Belfast   Opposed
Jim Campbell, Belfast  Opposed
Jonathan Fulford, Belfast   Opposed Climate change
Rachel Herberner,  Belfast. Opposed. Climate change
Douglas Misca.  Bayside  Opposes Eminent domain before court decision.

 Finally  Part three it becomes an hourlong City Council discussion on the merits of the issues and concerns raised by the public, concluding with a council member's variant on a standard "used to be from Away", mobile-home-evoking stump rant glorifying Belfast's Company Town capitalism of the past as precursor to a foreign-owned tankfish  farming future  before the council finally finally got him to stop. They then voted unanimously in favor of the proposal  to seize the Intertidal Conservation Area.  
So it goes.


Aug 8, 2021

Bay History: 2001-2005 Environmental Conflicts & Initiatives.

The below archived Penobscot Bay Watch media releases  discuss relevant local/state/federal events & issues  as they rose and fell during Governor King's 2nd term and Governor Baldacci's 1st term .  2/2/01 - to 2/7/205  Topics  Knox county airport expansion, state rockweed conservation, Samoset marina sprawl, local landfills, out of state waste imports, dredge spoils, state trawl survey &, shedder lobster impacts,  salmon fishpens,  state aquaculture task force, shellfish farming, a Sears Island LNG terminal plan - and more!

NOTE some  internal links are outdated

2001









2002  








2003












2005 









*














*



Aug 7, 2021

Belfast harbor struggle: Court sets Aug 27th oral arguments on plaintiffs' charge of improper acts by Governor, staff & family.l

 DEP 80C Appeal: 8/27 Oral argument in the DEP case on my Motion to Amend

Justice Murray has scheduled a ONE HOUR oral argument, on 8/27 beg



inning at 3 p.m. on my motion to amend the 80C Petition to include independent claims relating to the due process violations resulting from the Mills’ Administration’s exertion of political pressure to influence the TRI determinations by BEP, DEP, BPL at the request of the Governor’s brother Peter and Peter DelGreco of Maine & Co. acting on NAF’s behalf and to promote the “burgeoning aquaculture industry”.  This motion and now argument was made possible by the FOAA responses that Lawrence and Paul doggedly dragged out of these agencies.  Time to connect the dots for Justice Murray.

The response filed by AAG Bensinger and Jensen, to my most recent filing of the supplemental documents that Paul got that the DEP, Reid and the Governor’s office withheld first from me and later even from Lawrence (altho he got more documents that I ever could), is based on the claim that none of these documents is in the record before the BEP so the political influence revealed is irrelevant because it did not influence the Board’s decision.  This is absurd of course because the only information that the Board did see was whatever Jerry Reid want them to see — nothing more.

The independent claims that need to be filed in this case are as much about what is not in the record, as what is in the record.  The issue is a simple "junk in-junk out” problem.  And the use of the same AAGs to represent DEP and BEP compound the problem and defeats the independence of the Board.  They even manipulated which board members could consider our TRI challenges — excluding Sue Lessard.

It would be helpful to my preparation to have a good summary relating to the exclusion of evidence from the record that others have endured, as well as the denial of the right to appeal to the full board that the Presiding Officer imposed later in the proceedings.  The dilution issue if one really good example that I am not well-versed in the details of — if someone could get me a good summary on this it would help..  I will work on a chronology relating to the sediment testing issue and the haul route for the dredge spoils. but these will be mentioned in passing — the focus will obviously be on the “non-trivial TRI issues” and the interference on that issue specifically — including excluding evidence submitted by Intervenors that was not included in the record, and the unappealable orders by the Presiding Officer.

Buckle up.  Winter is coming...

Battle arises against attempted Norwegian seizure of Maine fishing grounds. 8/3/21

 Preeminent lawyer Wesley Horton retained to defend against the City of Belfast’s attempt to take private property

(BELFAST, MAINE AUGUST 3, 2021)—Upstream Watch has retained the legal services of Attorney Wesley Horton, who successfully argued in the United States Supreme Court the leading eminent domain case in America, Kelo v New London. This is in response to the City of Belfast’s attempt to take for Nordic Aquafarms the private property of two Belfast residents. 


Nordic Aquafarms has to date been unable to acquire clear title to the land they claim to need for their proposed pipelines. To help Nordic, on August 3 the Belfast city Council will consider whether to take the land Nordic says it needs by eminent domain (Item 10C on the agenda). Council members Mike Hurley and Neal Harkness have both stated that the city needs this privately owned land so that they can allow Nordic to put their pipes through it. 

Item 10C does not offer any explanation of what is proposed but only cites “23 MRS 3022 and 30-A MRS 3101” to vaguely describe this agenda item. When asked to explain item 10C, Michael Hurley replied “Ask your lawyer”. Taking private property by the government for private gain has serious legal consequences.


Upstream Watch has been preparing for this possibility, and has added to their legal team some of the top lawyers in the country: Attorneys David Silk and David Perkins and Attorney David Losee have been joined by Wesley Horton and Michael Taylor of Horton, Dowd, Bartschi and Levesque. They will be coordinating closely with Attorney Kim Ervin Tucker who is representing the Friends of Harriet L. Hartley Conservation Area and property owners Judith Grace and Jeffrey Mabee from whom the property would be taken..

Wesley Horton’s list of cases on which he appears as counsel spans 35 years. He has argued over 125 cases to the Connecticut Supreme Court. Most notably, he argued and prevailed before the U.S. Supreme Court in the notable condemnation case, Kelo v. New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

Amy Grant of Upstream Watch states “Frankly, it is baffling why the city would pursue this incredibly expensive and ill-fated scheme. We are fortunate to have an unparalleled team of eminent domain litigation experts onboard who are ready to defend against the City of Belfast’s illegal taking of private property. Just because the city wants to take private property doesn’t make it right or legal”