Search

Jun 19, 2021

Second Battle for the Bay begins in Superior Court June 21st. Fierce fighting against salmon tankfarming menace in Belfast to reach critical point

Attorneys for two bay defender groups have joined forces in a combined effort to fend off invading Norwegian corporadoes threatening Belfast Bay.   From June 21-24 their case, the "Matter of Mabee and Grace v. Nordic Aquafarms, Inc" (14pg pdf), will be tried before Justice Robert E. Murray in Belfast Superior Court.

At the above link, read the conservationists' brief to Superior Court in Belfast 

At trial,  Plaintiffe Upstream Watch (“Upstream”), Plaintiffs Jeffrey Mabee and Judith Grace (“Mabee/Grace”), and Friends Of the Harriet L. Hartley Conservation Area (“Friends”) will prove that: 

(i) the easterly boundary of Janet and Richard Eckrotes’ (collectively, “Eckrotes”) [...] is the high water mark of Penobscot Bay; and

(ii) the intertidal land abutting the Morgan’s, 1 Eckrotes’, and Schweikerts’ upland was initially retained by Harriet L. Hartley at the time of the conveyance of upland to Fred Poor and then subsequently conveyed to William and Pauline Butler (collectively, “Butlers”) in 1950.  Mabee/Grace now own the intertidal land that adjoins their upland,  and the upland properties now owned by Morgan, the Eckrotes, and the Schweikerts. 2

NORDIC WILL RESPOND

Nordic will argue that: 

(i) the phrase “along high-water mark of Penobscot Bay” in the 1946 Hartley-to-Poor deed3 and the 1964 Bells-to-Grady deed is a “call to the water” that actually means the low water mark of Penobscot Bay which did not cause a severing of the upland from the intertidal flats; and

 (ii) the Eckrotes always understood that they owned the intertidal land on which their lot fronts. However, neither the Eckrotes nor Party-inInterest Morgan—whose waterfront boundary is primarily derived from the same Hartley-to-Poor deed—have proof of title to this intertidal land beyond the speculations and erroneous legal interpretations offered by Nordic, previously rejected by this Court in its June 4, 2020 Order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. 

We'll keep an eye on this fast moving fight.

Implications for ancient Georges Bank: Why the Tasmanians stopped eating fish?

From:  Why did the Tasmanians stop eating fish?   from Scienceblogs.com

Implications for ancient Georges Bank

Georges Bank is a very large shallow area in the North Atlantic,  [around 8,050 square miles.] , that serves as a fishing ground and whaling area (these days for watching the whales, not harpooning them) for ports in New England, New York and Eastern Canada. 

Eighteen thousand years ago, sea levels were globally at a very low point (with vast quantities of the Earth's water busy being ice), and at that time George's Bank would have been a highland region on the very edge of the North American continent, extending via a lower ridge to eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and separated by a low plain (covered in part by glaciers) to the rest of New England.1

As sea levels began rising around twelve thousand years ago, George's bank became a narrower peninsula and eventually an island visible from the mainland. We know that people lived on this island because artifacts of early Native American groups have been dredged up here, along with the teeth of Pleistocene elephants and other items.

Eventually, the island would have been too far from the shore to see, although one might expect people living on the island or the mainland would have known about the other lands, and probably about the people on them, as there is good evidence that maritime activity was fairly intensive in this region. Indeed, it may well have been the existence of George's Bank that fueled the maritime activity that was apparently much more intensive between five and seven thousand years ago in this region.

But eventually, it is quite possible that as post-glacial sea levels rose, and the island that was to become George's Bank became smaller, that it became unconnected in all the ways one might expect, including the movement of semi aquatic land mammals (humans included in their own way), human memories, and so on.

What happened at the end, when the island finally went under, assuming that humans were still living there? Did these humans have a viable long distance maritime culture, allowing them to get on boats and, with some risk but also a reasonable chance of success, move to Cape Cod or Maine or what was to someday become Boston? Did they have boats only adequate for local transport, but still attempt, with much greater risk and much lower chance of success, to go somewhere? And if so, if they were not any longer a maritime people, did they even know which way to go? Did they just become inundated by the sea, perhaps living as the people of The Maldives live today, on a very low island in the middle of the sea, no one ever stepping on land more than a few feet above sea level, but then become wiped out by some singular event, like a tidal wave or a very bad hurricane?2 Or, perhaps, were these people wiped out before they ever had the dubious opportunity to experience the final inundation of their lands? With what must have been a shrinking population under conditions of shrinking resources, it is quite possible that warfare, pestilence, and other nasty things could have depopulated "George's Island" centuries before the watery Apocalypse.

And, just as interestingly, what happened before the final inundation? Not just before, but over the centuries before, as the specific result of being cut off from the mother mainland culture? Did the George's Bankers become a culture distinct from that on the mainland? Did this culture either posses features not seen elsewhere, or lack them because they never arrived to this remote place? Or, did the George's Bankers lose certain traits that the mainlanders kept because ... well, because of some reason or another?

Nobody knows. But we to know the following: The story of George's Bank is a story that probably played out in dozens of locations around the world where segments of large land masses (mainly continents) were at first cut off via land, then via eyesight, then perhaps via regular maritime travel, and somewhere along the way, via the complete cessation of medium and long distance cultural interaction of the kind in which most other people on the planet were engaged. In some of those cases, total inundation happened, but in others, not. And thus, there are two classes of islands occupied by humans: Those we have discovered and moved to, and those that were not originally islands and became so while we were there.

The most famous example of the first is probably the numerous Pacific Islands running from Melanesia to Polynesia. The most famous example of the second is probably Tasmania.

Jun 3, 2021

Sears Island tidal stream - rotting, reeking film coating its floors and sides. What is THAT?

 What is this  stinking whitish material  coating land rock and seagrass in the Wassumkeag tidal stream  at the NW end of  Sears Island?  See video shorts of that stream site